|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 31st, 2006, 02:09 PM | #31 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
But to give you an idea, on a 2.6 Mhz Pentium4, a Bleach bypass effect + Black diffusion lens + White diffusion lens, it renders at about 5 fps. So a 10 minute movie like Ben's would render in approx. 1 hr. |
|
March 31st, 2006, 03:38 PM | #32 |
Trustee
|
That's about right. Normal rendering time for that entire video with one setting was about an hour, but when I started to use the individual scene selection tool it increased to a bit over that--about an hour and 20 minutes or so. Really not that bad, compared to previous look suites that took multiple hours.
__________________
BenWinter.com |
April 1st, 2006, 07:04 AM | #33 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Motukarara, New Zealand
Posts: 475
|
lens change?
Hey, Nice piece.
Some newbie mistakes and some challenging shots attempted and succeeded. An interesting mix. The steadicam spin as guy gets out of the car worked pretty darn well, even with the bobble... the "crane" at the end worked great. What was that? gl2 on a rope? So some of this is color correct, but i found the back porch shots just looked much different/better than the rest of the piece. Was this just good natural lighting? Did you change to a different (better?) lens? Great stuff. some real nuggets of brilliance there. -a |
April 1st, 2006, 12:47 PM | #34 | ||
Trustee
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for your comments. I think if we had more time the mistakes could've been ironed out a little more. There are definately some things I'm still not happy with. And I can't exactly remember what lenses I was using when, but I'm fairly certain I was using a 55mm 1.2f on the porch. It's an almost $300 lens, so that may be why that looked good :)
__________________
BenWinter.com |
||
| ||||||
|
|