|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 4th, 2006, 06:54 PM | #76 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 274
|
That must account for the 3 month wait.
|
January 4th, 2006, 07:39 PM | #77 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
|
|
January 5th, 2006, 01:18 AM | #78 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 49
|
Dark Footage
I have the Letus35 Flipped and when I go into a room with a really bright bulb shining, filling the room... my letus35 flipped is really really dark, I mean really dark.
Anyone else having the same problem? |
January 5th, 2006, 01:26 AM | #79 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
|
|
January 5th, 2006, 01:32 AM | #80 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 49
|
I'm using the DVX100a, with an 35-70mm SLR zoom lens...
|
January 5th, 2006, 01:42 AM | #81 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
|
|
January 5th, 2006, 01:52 AM | #82 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 49
|
3.5 I believe
|
January 5th, 2006, 01:57 AM | #83 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 118
|
someone stop me if im wrong, but...
having worked on a flipping design before ordering a letus35 flip, the calculated light loss from adding the flip system should be barely noticeable. assuming its using four front surface mirrors, which have a light reflectivity of >97%, there would be a total light loss of about 88%. gah, i can't wait till i get mine. also, i havent seen any 35-70mm zooms out there that are faster than f/3.5 so this might be contributing to your problem. its nice to have a zoom, but some fast primes will definitely help with low light. |
January 5th, 2006, 03:15 AM | #84 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
For example, Nikon 35-70 f/2.8 (new on ebay) http://cgi.ebay.com/NIKON-35-70-MM-F...QQcmdZViewItem Any zoom lens that keeps a 2.8 constant aperture trough the whole focal range is going to be costly, but there are some really nice cheaper alternatives than the Nikon and Canon lens. Tokina, for example, has a 28-80 f/2.8 lens (the 280 AT-X Pro) with great reviews. There's also a 28-70 f/2.8 (newer), which is slightly inferior in terms of quality (for what I read). Tamron and Sigma also build zoom lenses in those focal ranges with f/2.8 constant aperture. They're very good to use with adapters, since a variable aperture -like the cheaper and more common f/2.8-f/4, gives you a darkening effect on the image as you zoom in (thus making them unsuitable for most video recording). In fact, I'm hunting for one of those lenses to use with my Letus :) Lucas |
|
January 5th, 2006, 10:11 AM | #85 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
|
|
January 7th, 2006, 04:15 PM | #86 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
|
|
January 7th, 2006, 04:19 PM | #87 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
|
|
January 7th, 2006, 08:32 PM | #88 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|