|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
|
Letus35/Redrock shootout
Having both adapters at my studio, I'd like to submit a side by side comparison of the two units. I'll be testing the units on Sony pd170s. Sorry no 24p. If there's no objections, I'll start Monday.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Contact me by email regarding how to obtain upload privs to our online image gallery.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 31
|
Awesome, this needs done.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 80
|
when do you plan on having this done? I'd love to see how they compete in imaging.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
|
Ordering, cost and arrival
Ok, let's start at the begining. Delivery time. Micro35 is around 12 weeks. The Letus 35 is around 1 week. Cost: Micro35 I spent $ 906.17, Letus $ 300.00. Both took paypal and accepted credit cards. Both companies were very responsive to email inquires. Sometimes Quyen of Letus would answer within minutes of a question! When the Micro35 arrived, packaging was exceptional. There is definately a "wow" factor when unpacking the Micro35. The construction, and the fit and finish are top notch. The packaging for the Letus was sufficient for safe arrival, but offered no "wow" when unpacking. That's OK in my book, efficient and low cost is good. The Letus is made from an extruded aluminum tube, extrusion marks and all. The fit and finish is a bit rougher than the Micro's, but it's 1/3 the cost. My initial gripe with the Letus is that inside the adapter is shiny aluminum! I always thought everything inside an optical pathway should be flat black and non reflective. I've since painted the inside of mine flat black.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Trustee
|
Quote:
__________________
BenWinter.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 31
|
You might want to try an epoxy paint for an application like that. This is sometimes sold as "appliance paint" in hardware stores as it can be used to paint refrigerators and similar things without chipping.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
|
Hey thanks! I'll keep my eyes open for the flakes
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
How about black magic marker? That stuff has no real substance to make flakes. Also, I am leary of spraying paint inside my adapter as the achromat is glued in place. What's the best paint for the outside? Has anyone tried a black decal/sticker?
Oooohh, I just had an idea. How about black velcro on the inside, the furry stuff, not the prickly side. That way, you get a flat black inside that will tend to trap particles. Any thoughts? I hope I didn't hijack the thread. I have the Letus35a and have noted the same shortcomings. They don't bother me since I saved so much by putting up with less polish. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
|
Critical GG Focus
The next issue is critical focus on the ground glass. Both units had to be critically focused. The Letus was a fairly straight forward operation. The lens mount and the GG are connected together so it is fairly easy to check focus by using a lupe on the ground glass. The Micro35 on the other hand has the ground glass as a seperate unit from the lens mount. So you unassemble the micro, remove the gg, loosen 2 set screws, move the gg to where you think it might should go, tighten the set screws, place gg back into Micro35 box, hook it up to your camera with a monitor (since I can't place a lupe on the gg.) and see if it's in focus. If not, repeat as necessary. In all fairness, it only took around 4 tries. Once the focus is set, you should be OK to go. I finally have some images to post, as soon as I get image posting privilages I'll do so.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 223
|
Cool can't wait to see 'em.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Duluth GA
Posts: 238
|
Ted,
So I guess the makers of the Letus35 needs to step up with painting the inside of their product at least (stop being cheap man!). I said wow too when I opened my M2, I really liked the packaging but hate the idea that I had to open the box to make adjustments. So if something get messed up, then what? send it back and wait another 12 weeks????. Could you please post some images of the 2 sets attached to your camcorder???. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
I haven't used either of these adapters, but I thought I'd weigh in on the whole rods or no rods debate. Our Optura 60 recently took a nosedive that broke off the focusing ring (Why God? Why?), and once the interior was exposed, I was surprised to see how fragile the filter ring assembly was. I previously thought the weak point was the threads themselves, but the whole thing was revealed to be secured by a four metal screws that are just screwed into plastic. It's secure enough for most things, but if other camcorders are manufactured in a similar way (and I'll bet they are), I think you might be taking a big risk screwing something as long as the Letus35 with external lens on there and letting it just hang. That's a lot of leverage, and one good bump -- crack! Not saying the Letus35 isn't a good product. I just wanted to throw this out there as something for consideration.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
|
Link for images
Here's the first of several more tests we have planned. It's a lot more time consuming than I had anticipated. Here's the link:
http://www.digital-west.com/adapter.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|