|
|
|
|
|
September 12th, 2005, 09:46 PM
|
#31 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 427
|
Maybe most/some of us are still waiting on lenses? Mine should be in Friday according to UPS. Chomping at the bit myself.
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 06:30 AM
|
#32 |
|
Trustee
|
I'm currently filming an advertisement with my adapter for film class. The due date is the 20th, so I should have footage up around then.
__________________
BenWinter.com |
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 07:53 PM
|
#33 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 16
|
I believe Quyen will be making mine tomorrow (Wed) and when I receive it I'll be shooting some test footage using my DVX100. I'll post something soon after that.
Jon |
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 07:57 PM
|
#34 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brighton, East Sussex, UK
Posts: 938
|
Looking foward to seeing it. Something we really need is some test footage. May you be the first to provide it.
Wayne |
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 08:46 PM
|
#35 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
How much light loss with this adapter?
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 09:14 PM
|
#36 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
__________________
i can't yet see Productions |
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 09:25 PM
|
#37 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 1,414
|
it's a goo design, I have a beta unit for the dvx I am shooting some HD with the unit, looks good so far but I am going to try some new achromats and see if we get better/shaper results
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 09:27 PM
|
#38 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
About probably means a little more than one stop, or he would have said under 1 stop. Hmm, how the M2 does in order to lose zero light?
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 09:29 PM
|
#39 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Obin, you are also using a micro35, right? How do they compare in your opinion? Do you feel the Letus35 is a better or more efficient design with the vibrating glass? How big is it by the way? Could post some of your HD clips done with the Letus35? |
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 10:08 PM
|
#40 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 1,414
|
I will not compare untill I get a proper achromat, lets just say I like the design of a non moving gg.
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 10:18 PM
|
#41 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 356
|
Michael Maier
We test light loss with f1.4 lens and it lose about 1 stop. That means the adapter lost less than 1 stop itself. Check the link below to compare between GG and Ariel image, thanks. http://www.letus35.com/split.mpg Quyen |
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 11:15 PM
|
#42 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
"the Micro35 is sharper, but I will not get to a final conclusion till I test the Letus35 with a higher quality achromat (So the Letus ships with a lower quality achromat?) to see if the problem is in the achromat or in the adapter. But I prefer the Letus35 design." By the way, the Letus also has a moving gg right? by the way, are you testing any other adapters like the G35 or the Mighty Pico? |
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2005, 11:19 PM
|
#43 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Aerial means? The gg side is actually brighter. |
|
|
|
|
|
September 14th, 2005, 12:29 AM
|
#44 |
|
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
I've completely removed my post here! ! !
Now, Quyen, please explain the meaning of AERIAL? Grazie |
|
|
|
|
September 14th, 2005, 12:43 AM
|
#45 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 356
|
I am sorry that the GG and aerial text has been swapped. The Aerial side is actually GG side, and GG side is Aerial side,
Quyen |
|
|
|
 |
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
