|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 11th, 2005, 09:44 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 422
|
Will this work? Lensbabies
Just wondered if there is any thoughts on this for a DOf Adapter? www.Lensbabies.com
|
August 11th, 2005, 10:21 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 356
|
Lensbabies only focus at 1 area, not depth of field. It has some nice out of focus affect and sure can be use on some applications. I at one point thought of using it but just don't want to spend a lot of time focusing on something that has litmited use. How is your adapter? Did you make any progress? Did you solve the vignetting problem? Hope everything is going good for you.
Quyen |
August 11th, 2005, 10:28 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 422
|
My Adapter
Well the Acromat is perfect, but my wires came off the vibrating motor and need to be resoldered.. Anyway thanks
|
August 11th, 2005, 10:48 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
It's a little of topic, but I thought I would ask. I see there are many people trying to build their own adapters. It seems there's at least two 35mm adapters being sold for a pretty affordable price. So why not just buy one of them instead of going through all the hassle of trying to make one yourself? I think it's not worth the hassle. Unless it's a do yourself sort of pleasure, I really can't see the point. And even though, since the chances of getting any better results are slim, since the ones available seem to produce pretty good results, it would be easier just to buy one of them.
I just had to ask it. |
August 11th, 2005, 11:02 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 422
|
Why we build.
First and formost we can hide the money from the wives if we spend it in small amounts rather then $500-$1,000.00 dollars at once... ha ha ha ... Ok That's one reason. The second we don't have $500-$1,000.00 dollars. Third is at least for me I started before these have been made to sell over a year ago. And last is we get the pleasure of beating the system or paying the REAL price for one. As for me, If I had the money I would just buy it and get it over with. Thanks for asking...
|
August 11th, 2005, 11:19 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 356
|
$500-$1000 is hard but I think $200 is not so hard.
Quyen |
August 11th, 2005, 12:21 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 613
|
Regarding the original topic of the post, you can easily do this effect in post processing with something like Joe's Filters Soft Spot, or Digital Film Tools Selective Focus. Both of these are for Final Cut Pro. You can see this effect all over music videos on MTV and MTV2, especially the more indie productions. Of course, as stated, it doesn't give you shallow depth of field, it just blurs things except the indicated region to keep in focus. The overall effect kinda looks like shallow DOF though. Used well, many average viewers definitely wouldn't make the distinction.
|
August 14th, 2005, 08:32 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 749
|
Craig,
Where did you get your achromat? Do you have a link? |
August 14th, 2005, 08:54 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 422
|
www.surplusshed.com
|
August 14th, 2005, 09:19 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 749
|
Sorry, I meant an actual part number page - there are sooo many on that site! Finding a good achromat is a difficult thing, so if you found one, it would be grea to know exactly which one. Thanks
|
August 14th, 2005, 09:25 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 422
|
http://www.surplusshed.com/pages/item/l3385.html
RECTANGULAR PCX LENS, 52MM X 44MM, 100MM FL
Item No: L3385 |
August 14th, 2005, 09:43 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 749
|
How did you attach the rectangular achromat portion to your DV?
|
| ||||||
|
|