Hi-Def Lo-DoF test clips at DVinfo.net

John Jay · June 24th, 2005, 09:17 AM

downrezzed to DVD here>

http://s36.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0...H16HAY0P59WNX1

(56 meg time limited, be quick ;)

Keith Kline · June 24th, 2005, 11:04 AM

Looks pretty good, what type of set up are you using?

Leo Mandy · June 24th, 2005, 04:17 PM

Look good - what are you using as a GG?

It looks static to me, you can see a few spots that don't move when the camera does, but wow, what a great looking shot. Nice color, no hotspot at all! Fill us in!

Dan Diaconu · June 24th, 2005, 10:17 PM

OK,... let me guess: a MF lens (2.8/80?) and a good Fresnel focusing screen, right?
His hair is a direct "threat" to my Felix...(but then again his skills are useless when it comes to playing with rubber mice....)The pic is as good as it could get (out of a static); no light loss, no vigneting, crispytysharp, (hmmmm....can you still see us down here?....)

John Jay · June 25th, 2005, 09:03 AM

Keith Kline >Looks pretty good, what type of set up are you using?

FX1E with 50mm F1.7 and 35mm-70mm F2.8-F3.5 (the manequin clips)

Mandy Leo >Look good - what are you using as a GG?

Its not for detailed public consumption atm; but it is a variant of a technique first published july 8 2003 see this post half way down page

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...2&page=4&pp=15

Dan Diaconu >OK,... let me guess: a MF lens (2.8/80?) and a good Fresnel focusing screen, right?

Not exactly, a picture says a thousand words? (small file)

http://s41.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3...T3GV5GA6ZTOLBO

The imager is removeable (see pic) for deep aeriel focus work ;)

At F1.2-F4.5 I crop 16:9 from 35mm Vista size (36x24); at F4.8-F8.0 I crop 16:9 from Academy size (22x16) (because of vignette constraints); and F8.0-F22.0 is deep aeriel (no imager). The length of the attachment is 20mm + FFD.

Leo Mandy · June 25th, 2005, 10:25 AM

Wow, you wrote that way back in 2003! I didn't see the motor you were talking about though in the original post - maybe you decided against it? If not, maybe you aren't showing the mechanism that would sit on top of the SLIDE (that is what it looks like to me!) and vibrates it (which would be cool as well). In any event, I guess I can't complain much anymore considering how long you have been working on this thing and with the great results you have gotten. Keeping it a secret is cool too, all that work has to count for something, right?

Another thing you said was using 16:9 to cut down the vignetting constraints - a solution that I had never thought of before - but it seem people like Oscar and Dan have full screen and don't have that constraints (I on the other hand do, sniff sniff) - interesting accomodation, never-the-less.

June 24th, 2005, 09:17 AM	#1
John Jay Major Player Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: US & THEM Posts: 827	Hi-Def Lo-DoF test clips downrezzed to DVD here> http://s36.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0...H16HAY0P59WNX1 (56 meg time limited, be quick ;) __________________ John Jay Beware *PLUGGER-BYTES*

June 25th, 2005, 09:03 AM	#5
John Jay Major Player Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: US & THEM Posts: 827	Keith Kline >Looks pretty good, what type of set up are you using? FX1E with 50mm F1.7 and 35mm-70mm F2.8-F3.5 (the manequin clips) Mandy Leo >Look good - what are you using as a GG? Its not for detailed public consumption atm; but it is a variant of a technique first published july 8 2003 see this post half way down page http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...2&page=4&pp=15 Dan Diaconu >OK,... let me guess: a MF lens (2.8/80?) and a good Fresnel focusing screen, right? Not exactly, a picture says a thousand words? (small file) http://s41.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3...T3GV5GA6ZTOLBO The imager is removeable (see pic) for deep aeriel focus work ;) At F1.2-F4.5 I crop 16:9 from 35mm Vista size (36x24); at F4.8-F8.0 I crop 16:9 from Academy size (22x16) (because of vignette constraints); and F8.0-F22.0 is deep aeriel (no imager). The length of the attachment is 20mm + FFD. __________________ John Jay Beware *PLUGGER-BYTES*

June 24th, 2005, 11:04 AM	#2
Keith Kline Regular Crew Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Akron, Ohio Posts: 153	Looks pretty good, what type of set up are you using?

June 24th, 2005, 04:17 PM	#3
Leo Mandy Major Player Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 749	Look good - what are you using as a GG? It looks static to me, you can see a few spots that don't move when the camera does, but wow, what a great looking shot. Nice color, no hotspot at all! Fill us in!

June 24th, 2005, 10:17 PM	#4
Dan Diaconu Major Player Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 804	OK,... let me guess: a MF lens (2.8/80?) and a good Fresnel focusing screen, right? His hair is a direct "threat" to my Felix...(but then again his skills are useless when it comes to playing with rubber mice....)The pic is as good as it could get (out of a static); no light loss, no vigneting, crispytysharp, (hmmmm....can you still see us down here?....)

June 25th, 2005, 10:25 AM	#6
Leo Mandy Major Player Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 749	Wow, you wrote that way back in 2003! I didn't see the motor you were talking about though in the original post - maybe you decided against it? If not, maybe you aren't showing the mechanism that would sit on top of the SLIDE (that is what it looks like to me!) and vibrates it (which would be cool as well). In any event, I guess I can't complain much anymore considering how long you have been working on this thing and with the great results you have gotten. Keeping it a secret is cool too, all that work has to count for something, right? Another thing you said was using 16:9 to cut down the vignetting constraints - a solution that I had never thought of before - but it seem people like Oscar and Dan have full screen and don't have that constraints (I on the other hand do, sniff sniff) - interesting accomodation, never-the-less.