|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 26th, 2005, 03:40 AM | #16 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 6
|
JVC GY-HD100U & Mini35?
Check out this photo from NAB...(6th photo from top)
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content...to-Gallery.htm Isn't this Mini35 300, attatched to new JVC GY-HD100U? ... Adopters for new JVC already out? Just hoping... it'll work for HVX200 like this easy... Like to hear some good news from P+S Technik or ZGC... ... |
April 26th, 2005, 10:03 AM | #17 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Cody:
What I was saying was that on the DVX adaptor you need to be at full telephoto to achieve proper coverage on the ground glass. I had a concern about the HVX being backed off to incorporate a step-down ring, thus potentially creating a slight vignette--but the additional range of the HVX lens in telephoto should be able to accomodate this. Jong, the relay shown at NAB for the HD100U was a mockup, but will be in production soon (I would think it would be out by the time the camera hits the street). It's essentially the XL series relay with the JVC bayonet on it. Assuming that Panasonic gets P+S a pre-release HVX in time, historically they have been able to get their adaptors out just after the camera goes on sale. They are of course aware of the camera and are intending to make a relay for it (this is based on conversations I had with both P+S and ZGC folk at the show).
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
April 26th, 2005, 10:48 AM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Springfield, MO, USA
Posts: 389
|
Charles, I'm the producer type (at least that's what my major credits are). So just wondering. If you use these 35mm adapters it softens the image and if you go to film out it'll soften it more correct?
The reason for my question is; I've done four 4 films on 35mm all released to the dvd, video, tv, cable markets. With my luck I'd shoot with one and then someone would want a film out that's reasoning behind my question. |
April 26th, 2005, 02:03 PM | #19 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
I think it held up pretty well, compared to the anamorphic. I was concerned that overall the results were probably too soft for a mainline theatrical release, but it was definitely nowhere near as soft as I thought it might be. Consider that with an HD camera, likely the transfer will hold up better as well. |
|
| ||||||
|
|