|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 14th, 2004, 02:28 AM | #31 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Brazil
Posts: 124
|
obin, what is the camera you used in this setup?
|
August 14th, 2004, 06:32 AM | #32 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 113
|
Since there is such a demand for these two files, why don't we bittorrent them? It will cost Les 0 bandwidth, and everyone (including the non posters) is required to lend a helping hand.
Rob
__________________
JVC DV3000U - 30P (non-interlaced) capture on a budget - tests@http://robvideo.netfirms.com |
August 14th, 2004, 07:23 AM | #33 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 1,414
|
dvx100 miniDV 3ccd camera Panasonic
the spot looks very nice..when you have moving images the "softness" is much less then a still |
August 14th, 2004, 09:36 AM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 445
|
I agree Les. I'll post a rez chart with and without my adapter. I even try and do the same with my friends P+S Technik mini35 because I have a feeling that with the larger image area of my adapter that its going to be a sharper image then even the P+S Technik (which uses a tiny cine sized GG)
-Brett Erskine |
August 14th, 2004, 11:44 AM | #35 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Brazil
Posts: 124
|
obin,
what was the HD camera u told that want to test with the brett adaptor? brett, if you come with a solution for the HD10u that is better than the PS TEKNICK, ... u sure are tha man ciao |
August 14th, 2004, 12:25 PM | #36 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern Cal-ee-for-Ni-ya
Posts: 608
|
Rob,
That sounds good. Ive used bittorrent, but how do I serve a file with it? Also, doesn't it rely on people keeping the file 'On' for the idea to work? I should have my free bandwidth back on the 16th. Brett, I agree that a bigger GG could mean a sharper image. The grain, integrated by motion, still disperses and diffuses the light rays, so a bigger GG would possibly minimize that. But we don't know at what resolution that happens at yet. My test shows that my 30mm glass still transfered an HD image. Therefore a DV 720 across image would not loose sharpness, the the frequencies that mine possibly attenuated are not present in a DV web cam sized image. -Les <<<-- Originally posted by Rob Hester : Since there is such a demand for these two files, why don't we bittorrent them? It will cost Les 0 bandwidth, and everyone (including the non posters) is required to lend a helping hand. Rob -->>> |
August 14th, 2004, 12:48 PM | #37 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 15
|
Hello all.
Thank you Les Dit for your answers. What's the name of the virtualdub filter? About bittorrent: The bittorrent client Azureus has a built in tracker (from their page: "Azureus has a built in tracker to allow users to share torrents directly, rather than uploading them to an "external" tracker.") The homepage is here: http://azureus.sourceforge.net/ Best, Magnus. |
August 17th, 2004, 12:28 AM | #38 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern Cal-ee-for-Ni-ya
Posts: 608
|
Virtual dub filter was the one by Giles Mouchard, google it! -Les |
August 18th, 2004, 12:15 PM | #39 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Water Valley, MS
Posts: 52
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Ladner : Sigh...
I'm waiting on southern Mississippi to figure out what broadband is, so that I can post some high-rez motion footage, instead of sequential framegrabs. ;-) -->>> Hey Frank, step up up to northern MS... we have broadband, believe it or not :-) |
August 18th, 2004, 12:25 PM | #40 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Poplarville, MS
Posts: 453
|
Magnus: Is this what you were looking for?
http://www.ifrance.com/freevcr/virtualdub/cnr-en.html <<<-- Originally posted by Bill Keen : Hey Frank, step up up to northern MS... we have broadband, believe it or not :-) -->>> LOL! Well I am glad to know I'm not the only Mississippian on these forums! Water Valley...is that in Yalobusha? |
August 19th, 2004, 11:15 AM | #41 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Water Valley, MS
Posts: 52
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Ladner :
<<<-- Originally posted by Bill Keen : Hey Frank, step up up to northern MS... we have broadband, believe it or not :-) -->>> LOL! Well I am glad to know I'm not the only Mississippian on these forums! Water Valley...is that in Yalobusha? -->>> yes sir, it is indeed Yalobusha county... small world, eh? |
August 25th, 2004, 02:29 AM | #42 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern Cal-ee-for-Ni-ya
Posts: 608
|
I can now email a link to the HD test I did at the begining of this thread, as my bandwidth usage was reset.
Brett, were you going to post a sample as well ? -Les |
August 26th, 2004, 05:02 AM | #43 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 445
|
Soon. I've been working too much to be able to work on it lately. I also have another side project in the works. On camera light powered by 200 LED's.
|
August 26th, 2004, 08:58 AM | #44 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 1,414
|
sweet - 200 super bright LEDS?
|
August 26th, 2004, 11:53 AM | #45 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern Cal-ee-for-Ni-ya
Posts: 608
|
Sounds interesting. One thing I learned though is that LEDs are not as efficient as compact fluorescents, as in lumens per watt.
I think one person here posted a picture of a setup that used a compact fluorescent with a battery powered inverter. A bit bulky. At least the LED light would be compact, and that's important. And they don't break when the lights fall over! -Les <<<-- Originally posted by Brett Erskine : Soon. I've been working too much to be able to work on it lately. I also have another side project in the works. On camera light powered by 200 LED's. -->>> |
| ||||||
|
|