|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 8th, 2009, 12:25 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
|
Xacti + 35mm + flip
Hello,
I remember seeing a guy put the Xacti upside down with a makeshift metal arm going from his rod support system's screw, to the Xacti's tripod screw whole (which was pointing upward due to the Xacti being upside down). Anyone have any ideas how this could be done? I want a 35mm adapter - thinking Brevis - along with some rails and the new Xacti. Love to put a follow focus on it too. Sanyo Xacti VPC-HD2000 Camcorder Review - Sanyo ....serious manual controls :) |
April 8th, 2009, 06:14 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Then why not get the flip module with the brevis and be done with it?
|
April 8th, 2009, 08:24 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
|
too long
. |
April 9th, 2009, 01:31 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hungary / Europe
Posts: 128
|
HD1010+dof adapter
pics:
Flickr Photo Download: ProDOF-S & Sanyo HD1010 #3 Flickr Photo Download: ProDOF-S & Sanyo HD1010 #1 Flickr Photo Download: ProDOF-S & Sanyo HD1010 #2 video: ProDOF-S & Sanyo HD1010 on Vimeo ;)
__________________
Robert Batta my stock video portfolio : https://www.pond5.com/artist/skysuta Pond5 – the world’s first web-based stock footage marketplace – |
April 9th, 2009, 06:17 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
|
thank you Robert.
that gives me some ideas on how i want my rig. i like the fact that it feels like one solid peice any others? |
April 10th, 2009, 06:53 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hungary / Europe
Posts: 128
|
more stable if use a ProDOF macro tube holder (for macro tube style 35mm DOF adapter + hard mounted Xacti)
macro tube holder pic: Flickr Photo Download: ProDOF MacroTube Holder
__________________
Robert Batta my stock video portfolio : https://www.pond5.com/artist/skysuta Pond5 – the world’s first web-based stock footage marketplace – |
April 10th, 2009, 08:38 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
|
April 11th, 2009, 09:53 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
|
yep.
if my Sony Z1 was 2.5 inches shorter it would be a much much better camera. if it were 2.5 inches longer, it would be virtually unusable |
April 12th, 2009, 07:13 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
|
April 12th, 2009, 07:21 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
|
thank God i don't
|
April 12th, 2009, 10:32 AM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
It looks pretty decent I would say. Compact because it is handheld. Might really help with run-and-gun type shooting.
|
April 12th, 2009, 11:19 AM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
1/4"-20 thread screw with an inverted wingnut and washer to tension... some scrap wood, just build what you need. If none of the available solutions are any good for you, make your own!
You can get 1/4"-20 receiving holes as well that hammer into place with 3 spikes on a circular plate and the threaded hole in the middle, drill a hole for it to slide into and hammer it home. This can attach to the tripod, a C- bracket to get the camera turned upside down with the 1/4"-20 screw hanging through to receive the camera. Basic DIY mentality solution, figure out where the main elements need to be, then build the parts to get them to stay there. If you don't have that mentality, no problem, people/companies have solutions out there (see above) to solve these problems. |
April 13th, 2009, 08:50 AM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
Are you trying to hide the camera somewhere or have some special needs that make a smaller camera preferable?
|
April 13th, 2009, 06:40 PM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
|
|
April 13th, 2009, 06:42 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 93
|
p.s thanks Cole
|
| ||||||
|
|