|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 21st, 2008, 08:33 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 138
|
best DIGITAL extreme SLOW MOTION option?
hey,
is there a good option for burst capture of extreme slow motion at close to high definition resolution? like 300fps or higher? i've been away from the boards for awhile but i recall a few years ago people were experimenting with imaging systems designed for scientific purposes that could capture direct to disk at high speed... i wouldn't mind lugging a full pc/capture card system around if it was just for a few specific slow-mo shots. ..i've also noticed that there are some digital still cameras that are getting very close to achieving some nice slow-mo burst acquisition, but none of them seem to be quite there.. if anyone has been keeping tabs on this stuff, any info would be appreciated. thanks, eric |
January 21st, 2008, 08:41 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
In the consumer market, the Casio EXILIM Pro EX-F1 (1200fps) made a splash...
|
January 21st, 2008, 08:47 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 138
|
that casio is pretty cool.. the problem is that the 300fps is only hitting at 500x300 resolution..
if it just had a higher res slow-mo burst ablility it would be a no brainer. |
January 21st, 2008, 09:31 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 336
|
We are talking about direct to memory at these speeds. Direct to disk is not very fast.
http://compumodules.com/image-proces...0arbeit_02.pdf |
January 22nd, 2008, 04:24 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 138
|
right, direct to memory. that motionblitz camera looks sick. i emailed some people for quotes, but i have a sneaking suspicion it awfully expensive.
|
January 24th, 2008, 02:24 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 138
|
got a quote. the motionblitz cube4 camera starts at $29,000. thats for monochrome, 1.5 sec record time, without lens. the slowmotion from it looks amazing but its a tad out of my price range. i was hoping for something under $2000.
|
January 24th, 2008, 02:59 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 336
|
You can use these cameras to change speed by extremely large factors. You can film a very small explosion on a tiny set and make it look like a huge one. A single project (even a single effects sequence) can pay for one of these cameras really for those who need the power. A camera like this only sells a few pieces and those have to cover the development cost which is very high. $2000 was a very unrealistic expectation! That gets you a very cheap consumer HDV camcorder perhaps. With 1/3" 60fps compressed cameras that sell by the thousands and still cost $8,000 or $10,000, how can you expect $2,000?
|
January 24th, 2008, 07:44 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Oregon
Posts: 138
|
i haven't been following the development of high speed cameras for the past few years. when i was a few years ago people were getting very close to retasking low cost cameras created for scientific purposes to perform as tools for independent film makers..
in 2004 people were very close.. that's four years ago.. i was hoping that someone took that torch and ran with it. i don't think $2000 is unrealistic. people have been messing around with high-quality sumix cameras that cost less then $1000 and getting very good results. look at what this guys was doing back in november of 2004: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...ght=fists+dawn http://www.purposelabs.com/ i thought in four years there might have been some advancements. i appreciate your help john and if i had enough money that motionblitz camera looks like a very stable and functional piece of equipment. |
January 25th, 2008, 01:57 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 336
|
24fps is different from 1000fps! It's a lot of data. We are also talking about very large sensors in these high speed applications.
|
January 25th, 2008, 07:26 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 86
|
Don't know why not many people are talking about this product: Vision Research
http://www.visionresearch.com/index....ts&prodcatid=7 v |
January 25th, 2008, 02:47 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 613
|
my guess would be the price. i recall most of vision research's products costing at least $100k...
|
January 25th, 2008, 02:48 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 336
|
The Photon models are considered high end. I hear of these a lot.
|
January 26th, 2008, 04:06 AM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
I looked around and found a mention of "realviz re-timer" software as one way to tackle this problem, with a price reportedly about $1500.
|
January 26th, 2008, 05:21 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Amsterdam The Netherlands
Posts: 200
|
I asked at visionresearch if you can rent the cameras, and you can (at least here in the Netherlands), the camera also is accompanied by an operator. For a one day shoot this may be in the reach of your budget.
|
January 26th, 2008, 03:00 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Paris
Posts: 72
|
god ! what would be the price of such camera ?!
|
| ||||||
|
|