LG Spec Commercial

Grant Carden · October 15th, 2007, 01:05 AM

Shot on HVX200 with the red rock adapter. 1.8 50mm Nikon lens...
In the process of fixing the green LG logo!

READ: Does not stream...wait one minute and the file will be fully loaded.

www.cardenfilms.com/lgnet.mov

Tell me what you think!

Grant Carden · October 15th, 2007, 02:41 PM

NEW LINK: CLICK THIS ONE!

www.cardenfilms.com/lgnet.mov

Rich Hibner · October 15th, 2007, 02:56 PM

i liked it. technically there was a shot or two that seemed real soft other than that, awesome job.

-rh

Noah Yuan-Vogel · October 24th, 2007, 12:13 AM

Looks good. very nice look and lighting. I wasn't totally sold on the actors or acting. Not totally sure why an electronics company would want people to "take a chance" on them, doesnt make them sound particularly proven or reliable which is what people usually look for. The shots that were mentioned as being soft didnt so much look out of focus as they looked like they might have too much diffusion filtering on them. But then again the bokeh is a bit foggy so its possible thats just how out of focus looks with that setup. if it is filtration thats not an uncommon thing to do on shots of girls, but seemed a bit overdone perhaps, especially on the first med->cu cut of the girl, since the second shot was a lot more diffuse. Overall it could use a little less diffusion to avoid being a distraction. Oh yeah and kinda looked like there was a cut where the paper airplane didnt even make it in the window cutting to it easily going in the window. Overall, though, it's produced well and i like the look and lighting a lot. that hvx+m2 is one popular combo these days. man thats gotta be a workout to carry around though. i might go with a canon hv20 or a1 + brevis myself since its probably less than a quarter the size/weight/cost. hope i wasnt too critical, just trying to be constructive :)

October 15th, 2007, 01:05 AM	#1
Grant Carden New Boot Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 23	LG Spec Commercial - HVX + M2 Shot on HVX200 with the red rock adapter. 1.8 50mm Nikon lens... In the process of fixing the green LG logo! READ: Does not stream...wait one minute and the file will be fully loaded. www.cardenfilms.com/lgnet.mov Tell me what you think! Last edited by Grant Carden; October 15th, 2007 at 02:42 PM. Reason: wrong link

October 15th, 2007, 02:41 PM	#2
Grant Carden New Boot Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 23	NEW LINK: CLICK THIS ONE! www.cardenfilms.com/lgnet.mov Last edited by Grant Carden; October 15th, 2007 at 02:42 PM. Reason: wrong link

October 15th, 2007, 02:56 PM	#3
Rich Hibner Major Player Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 218 Images: 1	i liked it. technically there was a shot or two that seemed real soft other than that, awesome job. -rh

October 24th, 2007, 12:13 AM	#4
Noah Yuan-Vogel Major Player Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: New York City Posts: 613	Looks good. very nice look and lighting. I wasn't totally sold on the actors or acting. Not totally sure why an electronics company would want people to "take a chance" on them, doesnt make them sound particularly proven or reliable which is what people usually look for. The shots that were mentioned as being soft didnt so much look out of focus as they looked like they might have too much diffusion filtering on them. But then again the bokeh is a bit foggy so its possible thats just how out of focus looks with that setup. if it is filtration thats not an uncommon thing to do on shots of girls, but seemed a bit overdone perhaps, especially on the first med->cu cut of the girl, since the second shot was a lot more diffuse. Overall it could use a little less diffusion to avoid being a distraction. Oh yeah and kinda looked like there was a cut where the paper airplane didnt even make it in the window cutting to it easily going in the window. Overall, though, it's produced well and i like the look and lighting a lot. that hvx+m2 is one popular combo these days. man thats gotta be a workout to carry around though. i might go with a canon hv20 or a1 + brevis myself since its probably less than a quarter the size/weight/cost. hope i wasnt too critical, just trying to be constructive :)