|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 19th, 2007, 10:56 AM | #16 | |||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
August 19th, 2007, 01:56 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV United States
Posts: 361
|
...on the se-300b module there is also the "line" switch... what does this do? (does it pass a hotter signal?)
And, my marantz pmd670 has mic/line in connectors, but, for what it's worth, the line in's are RCA, so i've never used them. My mic in's are XLR, so I use them instead. And I also leave the preamp module (se-300b) on 75hz cut, because it's always on a boom... Any suggestions or perhaps a different setup you would recommend? Thanks, Lonnie
__________________
Lonnie Bell mamas boy productions Las Vegas, NV |
August 19th, 2007, 02:17 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 173
|
Don't know what you mean by 'line' switch, do you lean "Lin" ? This means linear ... ie. normal, not "low-cut"!
|
August 19th, 2007, 02:43 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV United States
Posts: 361
|
glad i asked - i assumed it meant "Line"... see what happens when a video guy messes around in the audio!
Thanks Kris, so by "Linear" or "Normal", it means no altering of the signal, just a straight shot? Thanks again, Lonnie
__________________
Lonnie Bell mamas boy productions Las Vegas, NV |
August 19th, 2007, 02:50 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 173
|
Exactly, it's just "normal", "low-cut" or "padded".... unfortunately you can't do "padding+lowcut", but this has never been an issue for me.
|
August 19th, 2007, 04:47 PM | #21 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bristol, CT (Home of EPSN)
Posts: 1,192
|
Thanks Kris. I too thought it meant Line.
Still wish I could figure out the hum. Only happens with the SG; not the HC. Same thing when I went through a mixer, but it comes and goes so I think it's picking up interference from something. Are shotguns more prone to that? |
August 19th, 2007, 04:55 PM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV United States
Posts: 361
|
Paul, i got a hum once when my recorder (phantom power source too) was plugged into a wall - found out the house's wiring was screwy... Tried batteries instead- Fixed it! Since then - batteries only for audio. No more hum.
Lonnie
__________________
Lonnie Bell mamas boy productions Las Vegas, NV |
August 20th, 2007, 03:16 AM | #23 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oostkamp & Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 32
|
I notice that everyone here is talking about the Blue Line series, while the ULS is more or less never mentioned...
Is there any particular reason why you guys all have the Blue Line mic's, and not the ULS ones.. ?? Am I missing something ? |
August 20th, 2007, 04:40 AM | #24 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Mainly it's price - for example, at B&H the ULS series power module and CK63 hyper capsule are US$1058 while the Blueline power module and CK93 hyper capsule are US$478. Also, for those interested in M/S mic techniques, the Blueline series has a figure-8 capsule available while the ULS series does not
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
August 20th, 2007, 05:17 AM | #25 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 173
|
Also, from what I hear, the ULS is far more sensitive to handling noise... I've heard it mentioned more than once that the ULS is only really safe in the hands of pros, with decent shockmounting, etc.. which I'm sure is enough to scare away beginners and/or those wanting robust general-purpose mics which won't be overly fussy about expensive shockmounting and the need for skilled boom ops.
And, second-hand knowledge again, I hear the ULS's hyper is only a slight improvement over the blueline's hyper.. The shotguns are leagues apart, but I can see how at this point how it might not make sense to pay so much more for a 'slightly better but handling noise prone' hyper and a better shotgun... when you can get the blueline plus a separate shotgun (416 or 4073) |
August 20th, 2007, 05:38 AM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oostkamp & Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 32
|
Thanks, didn't know about the handling noise thing..
|
August 20th, 2007, 07:28 AM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Burlington
Posts: 1,976
|
If the hum is just isolated to the shotgun capsule and switching to the hyper capsule without changing any other variable fixes the hum, then I would look for dirt or oxide on the shotgun capsule contacts or the insulating material near the contacts.
I haven't used the Blue Line but do have the ULS and while I don't think the ULS is more prone to handling noise, I do think the handling noise you get is of a higher frequency than normal handling noise. So it's harder to roll off and sounds more noticeable. The ULS power module and capsules are very thin-walled and lightweight. I think this is what creates their particular handling noise. With a good shockmount, proper cable routing and proper technique, I don't find it to be a major problem but I can understand why it gets that reputation. |
August 21st, 2007, 11:35 AM | #28 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oxford (UK) and Vrindavana (India)
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Why I bought the Blue Line system is for several reasons: 1) really handy fast switch the capsules on location 2) Price/performance ratio 3) Lightweight, small and cute. 4) three years warranty I got it specifically for my personal video project about Holy men in Himalayas. Will keep you updated how it works in real situation. Having said that I like the shotgun it is a good compromise if you need something portable and decent quality. The pick of the sound is also good (to my ears) The CK 91 is a little better and it sound more naturally, very clean indoor pick up. I will use it for indoor recording. On the Canon XH A1 I have noticed a problem with the zoom servo, the mics pike up the noise of the motor. What is the best way to eliminate the zoom noise when having mic on the camera? Normally I do use zoom sparingly but just in the case... Thanks Pavel Last edited by Pavel Tomanec; August 21st, 2007 at 11:51 AM. Reason: clarification |
|
August 21st, 2007, 11:57 AM | #29 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oxford (UK) and Vrindavana (India)
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Thank you Ty. This is a good news that the mono mike can be recorded on two tracks and each track set to different volume level level. Regarding cable length, the Canon XH A1 manual says cables over 3 meters are not recommended. I just got premium quality Audio Technica 10m cable would that have any dramatic effect on the sound? Any suggestions? Thank you. Pavel Last edited by Pavel Tomanec; August 21st, 2007 at 12:10 PM. Reason: typo |
|
August 21st, 2007, 12:29 PM | #30 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
I don't think so.
Regards, Ty |
| ||||||
|
|