|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 21st, 2003, 08:04 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 585
|
Loud noise damage microphone?
I need to shoot some people skeet shooting with shotguns on a shooting range.
I want to be close to the shooters with a wide angle lens. Do I need to protect the microphones at all from the sound of the gun's blasting? Thanks. BB |
May 21st, 2003, 08:20 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,334
|
You say, "protect the microphoneS'?
Yes, depending on which mic your are using. Many condenser microphones will be damaged by the sonic blast from a shotgun. The more sensitive/expensive, the higher the probability. I am not sure about the on board Canon camera mic, but there are a few mics made that can take a big jolt. The sennheiser 421 being one of the best. If I were you, I would use an off camera mic and put it at a distance that doesn't overload it.
__________________
Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager |
May 21st, 2003, 10:56 AM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
I thought if the decible level was over the threshold of the mic it would just distort the captured audio data....not physically damage the mic?!
|
May 21st, 2003, 11:08 AM | #4 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Don't forget to protect yourself and the camera as well. I have
heard (never fired a weapon myself) that some weapons can produce quite strong "shockwaves" and can actually damage things up close.... Be very carefull! Please.
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
May 21st, 2003, 11:14 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,334
|
No, you can actually damage the diaphragm, especially on really good mics
like neumanns. The diaphragm on those is very thin and sputtered with gold. When you hit it with a shock wave from something like a shotgun, that blast first makes the diaphragm travel as far as it can, pinning it, then the rest of that shockwave can tear it apart or crumple it as they are very fragile.
__________________
Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager |
May 21st, 2003, 03:09 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 177
|
How do you protect an on-camera mic in this situation? Would it be enough to wrap it with saran wrap or something to start obsorbing the shock wave before it gets to the diaphram. Also, do most electret mics have any problems with this?
|
May 21st, 2003, 06:56 PM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,334
|
>>How do you protect an on-camera mic in this situation?
I am not sure an electret mic would be ( could be ) damaged. It probably just bottoms out . . . yeach. What's the point? We're thinking about how to get great audio at this skeet range . . . yes? >>Would it be enough to wrap it with saran wrap or something to start >>obsorbing the shock wave before it gets to the diaphram. Well, . . . maybe, but is that going to give us Universal Studios results? Personally, I would find a nearby studio that could rent me a Sennheiser 421 for $10-20 bucks. That would be my "shotgun sound" mic. Then, I would use another mic to cover the shooter . . . That mic is going to get crunched with each trigger pull, so you need something that can take it (even if it goes to 'excursion'). Hey, what are rental mics for? Rent a Sony ECM55 for another $10 . . . perfect. Battery powered . . . lots of output . . . nice phat sound. Then again, most guys will go with the on camera mic ;|
__________________
Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager |
May 21st, 2003, 07:04 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 177
|
>>
Would it be enough to wrap it with saran wrap or something to start obsorbing the shock wave before it gets to the diaphram. << > Well, . . . maybe, but is that going to give us Universal Studios results? Personally, I would find a nearby studio that could rent me a Sennheiser 421 for $10-20 bucks. That would be my "shotgun sound" mic. < I was mainly conserned about not damaging the mic. I would use something else for capturing the actual audio to use. |
May 22nd, 2003, 06:22 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 585
|
I'm just worried about damaging the on-camera mic when I get in close to the guns while I'm shooting video. Any ideas on protecting it?
|
| ||||||
|
|