|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 9th, 2007, 01:01 PM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
|
Microphone Specs
What are the most important specs?
How do you read them and what do they mean? Do they mean that much? (I know in other technologies they can make the numbers appear good no matter what.) I'm thinking of noise ratio and sensitivity. |
May 9th, 2007, 09:27 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Sensitivity is good.
Lavs are less sensitive than other mics because their diaphragms are smaller. Selfnoise is important; lower selfnoise is better. Pattern is important; cardioids, hypercardioids, omnis, figure of eight. They seldom talk about actual patterns, off-axis frequency response and phase response. What I'm saying is, you asked a really big question. The answer to which is that specs are frequently written to make the mic look better than it really is. You can make some silly mistakes by buying a mic based on specs alone. Regards, Ty Ford |
May 10th, 2007, 09:48 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
|
Let me narrow it down. What do the numbers mean? For example here are the specs from two mics I own:
AT822 OPEN CIRCUIT SENSITIVITY -45 dB (5.6 mV) re 1V at 1 P SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 70 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa Oktava MK012 Sensitivity 10mV/Pa No signal to noise ratio listed |
May 11th, 2007, 05:14 AM | #4 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
The Octava generates a stronger output voltage with the same sound level but the fact that they don't tell you the SN ratio means you have no idea (from the specs) if it's going to be usable or not. A mic mfgr that doesn't list full specs is one to be suspicious of when plunking down your cash. Not that their products might not be okay but you have to wonder what they're trying to hide. You can find a lot of info on www.microphone-data.com
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
May 11th, 2007, 06:46 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mystic Ct.
Posts: 477
|
Something that confuses me is...
"SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 70 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa" Given equal specs what would be better than the listed spec. SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 60 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa or SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 80 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa Bill
__________________
Cinematographers Bring Shadow To Light |
May 11th, 2007, 07:51 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
|
i found this article. i'm still reading through it. i didn't realize all math/science thats behind it.
http://www.dpamicrophones.com/Images/DM00665.pdf "The signal to noise ratio, or S/N, expresses the relation between a reference sound pressure level and the A-weighted equivalent noise level (self-noise). The reference sound pressure level is 94 dB re. 20 μPa. Hence the signal to noise ratio is 94 dB minus the equivalent noise level." From that I'd gather that 94 db would be zero noise, so the lower the number the higher the noise. Although, I'm not clear on what S/N would be considered good, average, and bad. Last edited by Pete Cofrancesco; May 11th, 2007 at 08:51 AM. |
| ||||||
|
|