|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 29th, 2006, 04:45 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 423
|
lavalier posiition... What's best?
I have an Shure wireless system that I use quite a bit for interviews (I know a shotgun would be better) but what I'm wondering is the best way to position it for clean audio without a lot of "P" pops and clothing rustling.
The mic I'm using is a cardioid found at B&H here: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...ughType=search Now, I think I made a bad choice with the cardioid, but it's what I have to work with right now. I've tried to see what professionals are doing on TV anytime I see a lav on someone. It seems to be split half the time between mic facing up, and half the time mic facing down. I know that with the mic I bought I can't have it facing down, but any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. If I get some replies to this thread, and if it seems necessary, I'll post some pics of how I currently position it. Now I'm not getting a lot of "P" pops or rustling, just enough on enough occasions for it to irritating. Thanks for the help... Kevin |
November 29th, 2006, 08:17 PM | #2 |
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Cardioid lavs are a pain to place cause you need to keep their ports uncovered and they are simply more prone to catch rustle, breath, etc. than an omni, however, in a noisy environment and properly placed, they can provide an improvement over omni lavs, so keep the faith.
A wind screen might help with the problem with those plosives. Carefully taping the cable will help with cable rustle, but if there's movement you're always going to pick up some cable noise. Some time spent listening with headphones is an invaluable learning tool, so experment with different placements, each lav and person and clothing combination has a sweet spot. Your listening for several things, 1. clothing rustle, 2. cable rustle, 3. too much bass or too thin sound, 4. sibilance, and 5. breath noises (especially plosives).
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
November 29th, 2006, 08:32 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Adirondacks of New York
Posts: 210
|
?You can't clip the mike to the talent upside down? You have got me there! Upside down will greatly knock down pops, and, nasal problems. Just a personal observation with my Samson mikes.
__________________
Himself |
November 29th, 2006, 08:33 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Adirondacks of New York
Posts: 210
|
?You can't clip the mike to the talent upside down? You have got me there! Upside down will greatly knock down pops, and, nasal problems. Just a personal observation with my Samson mikes.
__________________
Himself |
November 29th, 2006, 08:35 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Adirondacks of New York
Posts: 210
|
Sorry Folks! I hav no idea why this is being posted more than once!
__________________
Himself |
November 29th, 2006, 11:01 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Burlington
Posts: 1,976
|
Some people recommend placing an omni lav upside down if you're having significant problems with plosives or breath noises. However, even omni mics become fairly directional as the frequency goes up, so this doesn't sound very good with many omni mics. Certainly a cardioid mic would not work well placed upside down below the talent's mouth.
I think using a windscreen, including small wire caps like on the AT899 and others, along with proper placement and instructions to the talent will sound better than upside down placement. Proper slack in the cable, as well as a stable mount with tape and a backing card usually quiets other noises significantly. |
November 30th, 2006, 04:33 AM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
Popping from 'plosives and clothing/cable noise are two different issues. For the breath sound and plosives, mounting the lav midchest over the sternum or on a suit jacket lapel at about the nipple line can help, also a foam windscreen on the mic is a good idea. (If you don't have a screen or you think yours might be inadequate, you can order them from Rycote, Full Compass, Markertech, etc for very reasonable prices.) Clothing rustle can be helped by making a "broadcast loop" arrangement of the cable at the mic clip - with the mic pointing up toward the subject's mouth, make about a 1" loop in the cable. From the mic loop it around and feed it loosely up through the wide end of the mic clip and then back down again on the other side of the clothing away from the mic, clamping the cable between the clip and the cloth. A Google search will turn up some pictures of what I mean.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
November 30th, 2006, 09:17 AM | #8 | |
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
90% of the interviews I shoot I do with overhead shotgun to Ch. 1 and Lavalier to Ch. 2 and in post I listen to the two. I often find myself using the shotgun primarily and mixing in a little bit of the lav to fill out the low end. So "both" is an ideal combination. But since the lav inevitably picks up so much movement sounds, even when perfectly placed, it's often the shotgun that saves the day if the subject moves alot. Of course, if you're subject is walking around, the wireless lav is the way to go most of the time. Mobility and once less crew person are compelling reasons to avoid booming with a shotgun, although the sound is often better if the boom operator is good at their craft. In either case, I still record camera mic going into the second channel. Give yourself some choices in post. Often it helps in dealing with a drop-out in the wireless audio. But I digress.
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
November 30th, 2006, 11:00 AM | #9 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
November 30th, 2006, 11:44 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 423
|
David - Thanks for the encouragement, and I am using a small wire windscreen that came with the mic. i hadn't thought about taping the cable down, I'll have to give that a try.
Jay - I'm interested in what you said about a "backing card." How large is one usually? Is it as simple as it sounds (cut a couple inch square of cardboard and put it on the back side of the clothing to give the mic clip something more substantial to clip to)? I'd love top hear some more specifics about this. Steve - I've been doing what I think is a broadcast loop, but I think after reading your description, I think that mine has been too small. I think that I've been at about 1/2 inch diameter, not the 1 inch that you suggest. Also, I tried a google search for "lavalier broadcast loop", "Broadcast loop", and "lavalier placement" but I didn't see anything that looked like what you were talking about. Could you possibly provide a link? David - Once I have the capital to buy a decent shotgun I plan on going with shotgun to line one and lavalier to line two, but that will be a little ways off. I've got to pay off some of the equipment that I've already purchased before I can make more purchases. And to do that I've got to get through a few interviews with good sound... Thanks again everyone for replying to my post. I look forward to trying the ideas presented here, and I hope to hear a few more. I'll post updates as I try these things out. Thanks, Kevin |
November 30th, 2006, 12:36 PM | #11 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Quote:
http://www.equipmentemporium.com/Lavarticle.htm |
|
November 30th, 2006, 09:18 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 423
|
Vito,
I was going to post saying that I couldn't read the article. When I clicked the link all that was displayed were the titles to the sections. To show you (Vito) what I got I copied and pasted the space where the article should've been into this post, hoping that you would give me another link, or maybe post the article. But when I pasted the blank area that I had copied... I got he whole article. Weird... So if anyone else has a problem with reading the article, copy the blank space and past it into so other text editor (I ended up using Word), and you'll be set. Thanks again Vito... |
November 30th, 2006, 09:55 PM | #13 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Quote:
|
|
December 1st, 2006, 05:52 AM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast, UK
Posts: 6,152
|
The best sound recordists that I've worked with avoid lavalier mic where ever possible. For sit down interviews they usually mount a cardioid mic (usually not a shotgun mic) over the interviewees on a mic stand, positioning the mic as tightly as possible.
This method also works extremely well if you're working on your own - you can use a magic arm on a spare light stand to mount the onboard camera mic. If using a lavalier, they usually have a windshield to prevent popping. However, they've usually gone through all other methods before using the lavalier. |
December 1st, 2006, 12:56 PM | #15 | |
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
I purchased a couple of DR Pro Tripod Mic Boom Stands from our local Guitar Center store here in Boston. They are easily found online. Not all similar stands are the same, some tend to droop more easly than others, mine have been top performers. Beware of those with round knobs that make it hard to tighten them enough. The only downside using these stands is they don't work well with a very large frame, but I'm usually framed tight enough that these stands make perfect boom operators, and they don't complain about the lack of craft services.
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
| ||||||
|
|