October 11th, 2006, 05:12 AM | #121 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7
|
I do have a technical question regarding the output.
The Edirol R-09 has both 1/8" Stereo Mini Headphone/SPDIF Optical Out. The Zoom H4 only has the 1/8 mini out. How much of a technical, read quality, advantage is it to have SPDIF Optical Out as opposed to 1/8 mini??? I'm planning to buy the Edirol FA-66 Firewire interface that has an S/PDIF optical input. |
October 11th, 2006, 10:25 AM | #122 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,505
|
Quote:
You can select either stero recording to record to 2 tracks, or select 4 track recording to record to 2 tracks, and then record again to 2 tracks for mixdown. So you could record guitar. drums on 2 tracks, and then lay down the vocal to go along with it. Not a true 4 track recorder. |
|
October 11th, 2006, 10:57 AM | #123 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Harvard, MA
Posts: 155
|
Michael L: has your unit arrived yet, and have you had a chance to put it through its paces..? Of interest to me are the unit's mic pre-amps' quality, the quality of the built-in mics themselves, and how much flexibility there is in adjusting the recording level (variable, or stepped..)?
Many thx,Rgds, Ross. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
__________________
XH-A1; HV-20; Miller DS-10; Manfrotto 695/3229; SD302/702; PCM-D50; FCS2; MacPro; 2.25TB |
October 11th, 2006, 11:02 AM | #124 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 122
|
I'd also love to know how reliable the phantom power is...
JP |
October 11th, 2006, 11:06 AM | #125 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Check out http://taperssection.com/index.php . There are lots of posts and links on how to add portable external power to the MT2496. As far as phantom power I plan on getting a Rode NTG-2 which allows you to put 2 aa batteries in it. Mainly for my HD100, but can be used with my MT2496 also. The included stereo mic is pretty good for close up interviews. Surprised me at least.
__________________
Boycott Guinness, bring back the pint!!! |
|
October 11th, 2006, 11:12 AM | #126 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,505
|
Quote:
Here's a quick synopsis: 1. The huild seems very sturdy. It's larger but more substantial than the Edirol R-09, and about the same size as the M-Audio Microtrack. 2. I like the quick push recording format buttons on the front of the unit. Makes for quick format selections. Once you start recording you can't change recording format, without stopping the recording process. (which is a good thing). 3. Recording is the same as the other units (R-09/Microtrack), push once to go into standby (button lights up and blinks) and once more to record (button stays lit). To stop recording you just push record again, and the file writes to the card. There is a slight 2 second delay to stop the recording after the button is pushed. 4. The menu, is more confusing than the R-09, but no more than the Microtrack. You push the menu button to enter various modes. Here you can redo your recording format (default MP3 is 44/128), but you can change your bitrate in the menu to go up to 320 or VBR. It doesn't seem to allow you to select 48hz MP3. Also in the menu you can rename/delete files (easy to do), as well as setup your recording format (Stereo or 4 Track). 5. Press down on the menu button to enter your input menu. Here you can: a. Select, mic source (onboard, Dual channel (2 XLR inputs)), b. Recording levels c. Phantom power d. Monitor (This is good. You can either have this set to OFF and you can only monitor the unit while it's recording, or select ON and be able to monitor your recording levels all the time, as well as setup your recording levels without having to put the unit in standby), Auto Gain (which I wouldn't use myself), e. Mic Model (can only be set using the onboard mics. Select from 5 different manufactured mic characteristics) f. Compressor/Limiter (As far as I can tell you can only use the built in limiters using the onboard mic). 6. Onboard mics: I like the onboard mics better than the R-09, as they seem to be less sensative (more directional) and produce less noise than the R-09. I also really like that you have the ability to set the Gain with a flip of a switch (L/M/H) depending on your recording situation. L (Low, is for loud situations of line in recodring), M (Medium, is for moderate recoding situations, and H (High, is for very quiet situations, and produces the most white noise). I would most often use L or M settings using the onboard for reception live music recording. The L setting is very quiet and the M setting is pretty quiet as well. I would normally use an external mic on a mic stand and attach the recorder to the mic stand as well. 7. The level meters seemed a bit sluggish, and maybe that can be fixed in a firmware patch. As I said I haven't really had a chance to see how it handles very loud reception situations. But from my quick tests, it seems that it would handles them with flying colors. Especially since the unit has auto onboard gain, where you can do a quick scan of your environment (Live band sound test), and the unit will use the onbaord limiters to prevent clipping, (Very nice). I hope to get a chance to try out the oboard compared to the XLR inputs using my AT822, and my matched pair of Rode NT5's (With 48v phantom). You can't adjust independant L/R channels using the onboard mic, but you can when you use external mics. I am also going to see if I can do passthrough (like the Microtrack) to my wireless using the line output 1/8 port. |
|
October 11th, 2006, 11:17 AM | #127 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,505
|
Quote:
This was one flaw with the MT recorders. I will be selling mine if anyone is intersted. Along with many custom built cables from Soundprofessionals.com. It records and works great, but I already have an Edirol R-09 and now a Zoom H4 which I like better, and don't need 3 recorders. |
|
October 11th, 2006, 12:47 PM | #128 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
http://www.bixnet.com/5v7libapa.html from bixnet. If it works, it will not add much to the size or weight. For 69.99 it's worth checking out. I wouldn't get one of those big battery sleds, sort of defeats the purpose.
__________________
Boycott Guinness, bring back the pint!!! |
|
October 12th, 2006, 02:50 AM | #129 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albany Oregon
Posts: 173
|
Joe, I saw the battery sleds, etc - ended up just using the internal battery since the gig got shorter before it started, ended up about 1:45 or so instead of 3 hours.
On the other hand, I had a really strange problem I've STILL to find time to chase down - the MT recorded the first hour fine, I hit record to stop it - changed both DV tapes and restarted, the MT STOPPED recording about 20 minutes into second hour. I hit record again, thinking I'd bumped it accidentally - the unit did NOTHING. Tried 2 more times, then became glad I had audio coming into both cams... The unit STILL won't record, it looks like it is but no change in track time readout, it just increments file #'s, period. Oh, BTW the battery indicator showed about half power when this happened, it was 'way lower than that on my other test with no prob. Tomorrow I'm gonna try a different flash card, maybe this low priced 4 gig card has a problem - at least, the two files I got were good - as for the rest of the sound, Samplitude's gonna get several of its goodies dusted off before I'm even close to happy (background noise, + pumping of camera's AGC mainly) Soon as I find out why the little bugger quit I'll be back... Steve |
October 12th, 2006, 04:57 PM | #130 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albany Oregon
Posts: 173
|
OK, quick update on the "on strike" syndrome - I tried a different CF card, records OK. Tried the "bad" card (Sandisk standard type1, 4 gb), and STILL no record - unit would "pretend" to record, but no time increment and when I pushed the record button again, it would claim to be "writing file", then would revert to showing just the two files already ON the card. Checked this card in a different reader/computer, and it showed less than half full.
I then reformatted that card (in the MT2496) and tried to record - IT WORKED. Wierd thing is, I had recorded nearly TWICE as much info on this SAME CARD the night before the gig, with no problems. I then erased those files (did NOT reformat, wonder if there is a bug in the OS (v1.0 firmware at that time) that required you to FORMAT the card after erasing large files??!? If there's time tonite, I'm going to re-record that card nearly full with large files (or until it quits) then delete them and try to record again - if that doesn't work, I'll FORMAT the card again - hopefully this will point to a solution (like, ALWAYS use a freshly formatted card??!?) Man, I really WANT to like this little guy, but... Steve BTW, firmware is now the current 1.4.3 as it was during the gig, so may reinstall 1.0 to see if the problem still exists. |
October 12th, 2006, 11:51 PM | #131 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY, US
Posts: 102
|
Michael thanks for the info.
I had a chance to take a quick look at H4, at one of the video shows on Long Island and it seemed very nice, in general. I might actually end up buying H4, instead of renting some high-end recorder for my short... Vic |
October 13th, 2006, 10:10 AM | #132 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quick question for everyone (regarding audio recorders) :
Do any of these digital recorders allow you to plug in TWO mics (one vocal, one for guitar etc) and then mix the levels ? In other words, do any of these recorders have the ability to be a simple mixing desk as well as a digital recorder? R-09 - can it do that? I have an iRiver IHP-120 which works great for taping bands from the mixing desk, but i'd like a recorder that will allow me to connect two inputs (mic in / line in) and mix the levels as for travelling having to transport a small mixing desk has weight & bulk issues. Any advice on this is GREATLY appreciated. Failing a suitable compact "mixer/recorder" device, if someone could suggest to me a SMALL mixer (not too expensive!) that i could use instead that would be great. thanks |
October 13th, 2006, 10:22 AM | #133 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Behringer has some small mixers in the $100 US range that might do, including a couple of battery operated models as I recall.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
October 13th, 2006, 10:40 AM | #134 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
But you don't know of a small digital recorder that can take two Line or Mic inputs and adjust the levels of those two inputs separately prior to writing it to a WAV or MP3 file? an all-in-one unit would be great. |
|
October 13th, 2006, 11:08 AM | #135 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,505
|
Quote:
Both of these units have phantom power capability, but only the H4 allows for true 48v phantom. The R-09 only allows for 1 input and does not have independant L/R level control. Now keep in mind, that these are very small audio recorders. For something more substantial look at the Edirol R-4, Fostex FR-2, Marantz PMD670 and such. |
|
| ||||||
|
|