|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 22nd, 2006, 08:47 PM
|
#1 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 16
|
AT4053 vs. AKG CK93
Howdy All-
Let me start by saying a big thank you to everyone who participates here in the various DVi forums, your knowledge and expertise has been and continues to be invaluable. CHEERS! I have recently purchased the JVC HD100u and am in the market for a decent hyper-cardiod for mostly indoor/ some outdoor boom work. From reading the various threads I have gathered that the AT4053 and the AKG CK93 are both respectable "2nd tier" hypers. I was wondering if any of the audiophiles out there have experience with both, and could relate there opinions. I know that it would be best to try them both for myself, but I'm in a bit of a timecrunch, and don't think I can wait for the mail order rental solution. Thanks in advance for your responses! |
|
|
|
March 23rd, 2006, 10:10 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,276
|
Hi Sam,
For outside boom work, you need a shock mount and windscreen. If you don't want to spend money on windscreen, I have a diy solution for you. Have a look at my post here for 0 dollar cost of a silk windscreen. http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...t=19505&page=4 Regards Leigh Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 24th, 2006, 06:58 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 796
|
We use the AT4053 on a regular basis indoors and out and it works great. Sorry, but no experience with the AKG.
__________________
Dave Perry Cinematographer LLC Director of Photography • Editor • Digital Film Production • 540.915.2752 • daveperry.net |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
