|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 29th, 2006, 09:30 AM | #46 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
When I'm on that page I seee a chart with the specifications for a huge list of headphones. Do you not see it?
Regards, Ty Ford |
January 29th, 2006, 09:39 AM | #47 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Grazie,
What Ty is suggesting (and I agree) is that even tho YOUR specific headphones aren't listed, YOUR headphones aren't terribly different from the AKG cans that are listed. Look at the AKG cans that are listed on the Rane page, and use that as a comparison. The values will be fairly close. Maybe you could pick up the phone or email Rane and ask them to update their page to include your specific model. Otherwise, just know that you're very close in relative sensitivity by looking at other AKG headphones in that list.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
January 29th, 2006, 12:05 PM | #48 | ||
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Bit late! Apologies .. been nursing my Partner . . ! Just given her a bowl of Chicken soup .. .
OK Dokey! Quote:
Quote:
Thanks guys. Grazie |
||
January 29th, 2006, 12:53 PM | #49 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
|
When I was at the Church, I looked up some information on the HD 280 pro.
Impedance 64 ohms (as per IEC 268-7) Input power 500mw (as per IEC 268-7) Frequency response 8 Hz - 25 kHz Sound pressure level 102 dB (as per IEC) 113 dB / 1 V rms Ambient noise attenuation Max.32 dB THD < 0.1% (at 51KHz, 100 dB SPL) Weight approx. 285 g Contact pressure approx. 6 N |
January 29th, 2006, 01:54 PM | #50 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
Wow. Ty, thanks! Rane seems to confirm industry scuttlebutt that 7506 are reasonably sensitive and Senn. generally not as much.
Grazie, sorry, I guess I won't be visiting your web site ;-( |
January 29th, 2006, 05:52 PM | #51 | |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Quote:
Phew that's handy .. 'cos I aint got one Ahahaha! ! ! . .and I now don't need to construct a table. Aint that sad - bloke without a website. Grazie |
|
February 14th, 2006, 01:53 AM | #52 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 479
|
I picked up some Sennheiser HD280s today for $150 CDN. A friend of mine has them and was telling me about how they "dissect" music but I finally really know what he meant!
__________________
Mark Utley |
April 1st, 2006, 06:37 AM | #53 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 585
|
7506 vs V6
any idea why the sony 7506 ($100) are the industry standard, when the sony v6 ($70) have a higher freq response (5-30khz compared to 10-20khz) at a cheaper price?
Is the 7506 better (louder) when used with DV cam outputs? Thanks. BB |
April 2nd, 2006, 07:57 PM | #54 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rohnert Park, Ca.
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
Looking at this chart I can't really see much difference between the Sony MDR-7506 and the MDR-V600. Am I missing something? thanks |
|
April 3rd, 2006, 07:22 AM | #55 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Apparently. Go out on a shoot. See who's wearing what. I think you'll see many more MDR7506. At some point, specs are just specs. There could be many good reasons other than specs.
Regards, Ty Ford |
April 3rd, 2006, 08:25 AM | #56 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
What about sealed headphones?
Remote audio offers modified 7506s with special baffling for $285. We had a shoot with a DVX100 in 24p this weekend and the camera headphone output has a really annoying delay. My own little Optura does as well. It makes it difficult tell if the room needs additional treatment. Would it be worth the extra expense, or am I making too much of this? I'll bet I could turn down the volume a little and give my ears a break as well. My hearing is already not so great (too many punk show in high school).
|
April 3rd, 2006, 09:01 AM | #57 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Good point. It took me a while to figure out that the DVX100a had to be in 24P before the delay was heard. VERY off-putting. I already get enough phase weirdness from headphones and live action.
Ty Ford |
April 4th, 2006, 03:23 AM | #58 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rohnert Park, Ca.
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
Thanks Don |
|
April 4th, 2006, 04:36 AM | #59 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 585
|
MDR-v6
If you like the sony 7506 ($100), you might want to check out the sony V6 ($70). They have a higher freq response, 5-30khz compared to 10-20khz.
(this is not the same set as the sony V600) http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/003955.html |
April 4th, 2006, 05:01 AM | #60 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Quote:
You don't need encyclopedic research to buy the right headphones for location audio. You don't see V600s on movie sets. You see 7506. If V600s were good on set, the entire location audio industry would trash their MDR7506 and buy them. Buy the 7506 and get to work. Regards, Ty Ford |
|
| ||||||
|
|