|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 1st, 2017, 10:04 AM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lowestoft - UK
Posts: 4,045
|
Re: Balanced: 180 ͦinverse of signal. How? Or rather where?
Just to confuse - while modern audio gear uses 3 conductors for balanced operation, one is actually not too important - ground. As long as you don't wish to use phantom power, just connecting pins 2 and 3 both ends works perfectly well - just losing the screening. If the discussion took a bit of time get settled in, this might be a touch too much - but loudspeaker connections could be considered balanced, mains electricity too, and until it gets to the switches and pots - even guitar pickups start off balanced!
|
September 1st, 2017, 10:28 AM | #17 | |||
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,238
|
Re: Balanced: 180 ͦinverse of signal. How? Or rather where?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
September 1st, 2017, 10:53 AM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: Balanced: 180 ͦinverse of signal. How? Or rather where?
"one is actually not too important - ground."
Yes, except for mic cables. It's common practice in recording studio wiring to only connect ground to one end of balanced interconnect audio cables for the outboard gear, consoles and patch bays, ect. In fact, I worked in a studio and when we did a renovation/rebuild, even the AC grounds on most of the gear was lifted, of course the gear chassis were positively and securely grounded to only one source. In this case, a 8-10 foot copper rod into the earth. A 'star' grounding system, as I recall. Another studio I worked at, had balanced AC power transformers.. it was very expensive, but it was a multi-million $ facility.. even the EMI prone single-coil Strat pick-ups were quiet. Of course a lot of this not necessary these days with no outboard gear and everything's done 'in-the-box'. |
| ||||||
|
|