|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italy, naples
Posts: 164
|
good lavalier around 50 -80 $
one of mine sanken cos11 was just broken and right now i need a lavalier for my sennheiser g2 sistem, around 50 -80 dollar how is the akg ck 55? has anyone of you used it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
Haven't used one but looking at the specifications reveals it is a cardioid microphone designed for stage and sound reinforcement applications. Cardioid lavs are not usually suitable for film or video use as every time the talent turns their head they tend to go off mic, leading to a poor quality, odd-sounding, recording.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
I very much like the Sennheiser ME-2 but it's an omni and a little past your price range. eBay may help. One thing I discovered was when the connector did not survive a long plane trip and became intermittent, for $60, I was able to pop in in an envelope to Sennheiser with the check and they'll sent me a refurbished one.
Last edited by Les Wilson; February 4th, 2012 at 06:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
perhaps the guy at giant squid audio lab can wire one of his, um, cost-effective lavs for senn wireless?
edit: I see he already has. Scroll down on this page for a $30 lav wired for sennheiser. I've used these mics - they are well worth the money. You aren't going to get a great mic for $30, but you will get a good one.
__________________
30 years of pro media production. Vegas user since 1.0. Webcaster since 1997. Freelancer since 2000. College instructor since 2001. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
Quote:
Home |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Split, Croatia
Posts: 189
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
not sure about the CK55 but the CK77 is a fantastic mic I use all the time. It has a very open and natural sound. But it's a bit out of your price range...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 416
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
Sennheiser ME2 is decent and can surely be found used for that price with some digging.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
I have been using these as low cost spares for the G2:
They are well made with metal bodies and clips and come with a non locking 3.5mm jack already fitted, you can modify them to add a locking jack or XLR connector which will also allow 12v phantom power to be used. They are marked as unidirectional but are actually very omni and work very well upside down, I now have several of these in the 3m cable version as wired lav's and two of the 1m version as spares for my G2. You can hear an example of the sound here: ![]() A few more tests on these and the larger 4033 here: ![]()
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italy, naples
Posts: 164
|
Re: good lavalier around 50 -80 $
i own 2 sanken cos 11, con sennhieser ew 100 g2, since one of those sanken is broken, i need a lavalier to replace it, i want to buy in future sennheiser series 2000, they have lemo connector and I will buy lavalier with lemo plug and not trs, but right now i want to have 2 g2 sistem fully operational, with 2 lavalier.
i bought at the ck 55, I know it is ideal for live gigs, but i am going to use it on interview where the speaker is still watching camera, so he is not turning head at all. he is giving me very good results. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|