|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 3rd, 2011, 09:34 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 10
|
Indoor recording solutions?
What do you use to record indoor dialogue and sounds?
I used a rode ntg 2 yesterday. The voice sounded fine but I also picked up a unwanted reverb. I will be purchasing a lavalier Sennheiser Ew 112p G3. It would be interesting to see what results i get. But i would love to know how others handle the downsides of indoor situations. Thanks! |
July 3rd, 2011, 12:51 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Re: Indoor recording solutions?
The general rule of thumb is a shotgun for outdoor, non-reflective, scenarios and a small diaphram hypercardioid "pencil mic" for interiors or reflective environments. Because of the way interference tube / line gradient mics (the typical shotgun) achieve their directivity they are not particuarly well behaved when there is a high proportion of indirect reflected sound hitting the mic along with the desired direct sound coming from the subject. Hypers use a different physical princple to achive their directivity and are not as seriously degraded by reverberent sound mixing with the desired direct sound. They can be almost as directional as a 'gun but are much better behaved. Typical examples might be the AKG Blue Line SE300/CK93, AKG ULS Series C480B/CK63, Audio Technica AT4053b, or if you want to go top-shelf and have a top-shelf budget to match, the Schoeps CMC641. Another widely favoured mic that serves well both indoors and out in the Sanken CS3 - looks like a shotgun but uses a different acoustic principle.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
July 3rd, 2011, 12:58 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: Indoor recording solutions?
"The downsides of indoor situations"
-- Lots of variables, but in general, avoid interference-tube shotguns. |
| ||||||
|
|