|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 27th, 2011, 03:13 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arcata, Ca
Posts: 750
|
Shootout of my Large Diaphragm Condensers
So how do you rank these? I know the best/worst to me are obvious, but the 2 in the middle of my ranking are neck in neck. 4 Mics. I recorded them at 10db gain, but level matched them in post so louder won't read as better.
Mic 1 Rode NT2000 Mic 2 Audio-technica AT4050 Mic 3 Rode NT1 Mic 4 M-Audio Sputnik
__________________
My Work: http://www.youtube.com/ChadWork1 Sony FS5 :: Panasonic GH4 :: Sony PMW-EX1 :: FCPx :: AT4053b :: Rode NTG-3, |
January 27th, 2011, 05:35 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 2,039
|
Based on the clips here, Chad's voice though the MOTU pre and A/D converter :
NT-1: I do not like the high-end .. at all. AT4050: It's usable I guess. M-Audio Sputnik: Smooth high-end and nice mid-range clarity, but contains some mild plosives. (which could be controlled by a stocking type pop filter. or surgically tweaked in post) The NT2000 would be my top pick.. for today at least. Surprise! Based on my experience with other M-Audio products, I thought the Sputnik would be dead last. |
January 27th, 2011, 05:42 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arcata, Ca
Posts: 750
|
I was pretty close, and did have a pop filter. I should have been a bit more back.
I have been really happy with the Sputnik as my main VO mic. I like the tube sparkle it give me. The NT1 - crap IMO. It was a really close tossup between the nT2000 and the AT4050 for me. I think I like the smoothness of the NT2000 over the slight extra sparkle of the 4050. Which is surprising. I was ready for it to be 1 - Sputnik 2 - 4050 3 - NT2000 4 - NT1 but instead for me its: 1 - NT2000 2 - 4050 3 - Sputnik 4 - NT1 Interesting.
__________________
My Work: http://www.youtube.com/ChadWork1 Sony FS5 :: Panasonic GH4 :: Sony PMW-EX1 :: FCPx :: AT4053b :: Rode NTG-3, |
| ||||||
|
|