Post-production dialog "sweetening"? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > All Things Audio
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

All Things Audio
Everything Audio, from acquisition to postproduction.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 8th, 2005, 06:19 AM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 170
Post-production dialog "sweetening"?

We're wrapping up a film for a short competition and I have a question about what can be done to improve the dialog audio.

There are only four lines in the piece, and it was shot outside so we decided to ADR the dialog. We are in a hurry (deadline is approaching) and there's no budget for this one so we're working with what we have on-hand.

We used Final Cut Express's Voiceover Tool to record the dialog using an inexpensive clip-on (lavalere) mic (bear in mind that the final output for this will be a Flash video file, so overall quality doesn't need to be THX or anything...). Overall we're very happy with the quality and sync, but in one particular passage, it has that "dubbed" sound.

I started experimenting with the audio tools in FCE (various EQ's, revererbs, etc.) but since we're in a time crunch I thought I'd see if anyone had any suggestions or thoughts on where to start. Since we don't have a budget we'll need to come up with something using the tools we have (FCE, Soundtrack, GarageBand).

It's a comedy piece so it's not the end of the world if it's a little "cheesy", but if I can improve the sound before we run out of time I'd like to give it a shot.
__________________
Jason J. Gullickson
Producer
the second society
http://2soc.net
Jason J. Gullickson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 8th, 2005, 11:44 AM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Venice, FL
Posts: 850
Did you get some "white noise" on location? You can use that to mix with your studio ADR to help it some. Background noise is subtle, but important. Other than that, my first thought would be that you might try some GENTLE reverb. BWTFDIK ?
__________________
You are either growing or dying.
Bob Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 8th, 2005, 01:53 PM   #3
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Costa
Did you get some "white noise" on location?
Yes, but that's the subject of another thread :)

The background noise made a world of difference and for the most part the dialog settles in nicely, but there is this one troublesome line and I can't figure out why it seems so unnatural. It would make more sense if they all sounded bad...

I'm going to watch the piece using a couple of different sound systems tonight and see if that makes a difference. I'm wondering if there is something I can do with stereo (phase, etc.) to make it less fake...
__________________
Jason J. Gullickson
Producer
the second society
http://2soc.net
Jason J. Gullickson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 8th, 2005, 02:42 PM   #4
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 31
If you can post a clip of the offending line (perhaps alongside one of the lines that worked well) I may be able to offer advice. There are a few reasons it may sound unnatural. Here's a couple:
1. Not properly synced--even a slight mistiming could throw off the illusion of natural sound. If this is the case, a little finessing on the timeline could fix it.
2. EQ -- you didnt mention whether all four lines were in the same location. it could be that the unnatural line is not EQed to the environment its set in (e.g. a bathroom will need reverb)
Jonathan Putnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 9th, 2005, 06:15 AM   #5
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 170
Thanks for the offer to help Jonathan! I will contact you off-list since part of the competition rules include no distrubution during the duration of the contest.

As far as location and EQ go, all of the dialog was recorded in the exact same location however all but the offending shot are extreme close-ups, so maybe all the sound is the same but since the actor is further from the camera the brain senses that something is wrong?
__________________
Jason J. Gullickson
Producer
the second society
http://2soc.net
Jason J. Gullickson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10th, 2005, 05:07 AM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Venice, FL
Posts: 850
Get a friend to come listen/watch. Even a non-pro may be able to help you figure out why it sounds "off". Just a second set of ears & eyes is often a good answer.
__________________
You are either growing or dying.
Bob Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10th, 2005, 06:17 AM   #7
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Costa
Get a friend to come listen/watch. Even a non-pro may be able to help you figure out why it sounds "off". Just a second set of ears & eyes is often a good answer.
I've tried that three times now and no one else notices the problem...laymen! ;)

...maybe I'm just being too critical of the sound.
__________________
Jason J. Gullickson
Producer
the second society
http://2soc.net
Jason J. Gullickson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2005, 01:09 PM   #8
Major Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Holland, Europe
Posts: 214
I don't understand why you guys wanna do a ADR and at the same time risk doing it good or better (no knowledge). If your original vocal recordings are bad, don't use them. People can't stand unhearable dialogs. Remember...video and audio must be top notch. So do an ADR using VST/direct x plugins. YOu can use thse effect plugins with almost everey audio program out there. YOu even have free audio plugins (google for them or look in www.krv-vst.com). YOu need to take the perfect voice-over, change the EQ, add chorus or reverb or whatever effects that is similar to the natural ambience effect found in your original room or space you recorded your video. Compare and keep on editing. Add backnoise as well to make it more natural. Keep that as low as possible. MAke a loop out of it if you can. Good luck
Jose di Cani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2005, 09:34 PM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ontario
Posts: 445
You said that the offending scene is the only different one.That it is a wider shot maybe.I think you had your own answer in that the brain will read this scene different and if the audio doesnt read that additional distance and/or movement if there is any, it wont be right.Try to give it some distance with a little echo, a little lower volume level and if the audio is too clean ,muddy it up a bit.If there is movement you may have to add a little(very little) pan.
Have someone talk to you at very close range then have them repeat this at a distance and see what you notice as different. This is agood exercise anyway.
Jack Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2005, 07:33 AM   #10
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose di Cani
I don't understand why you guys wanna do a ADR and at the same time risk doing it good or better (no knowledge).
Hmm...

I'm not sure what you're saying exactly but the reason we're doing ADR is because we couldn't use sound on-location, it was a city street corner with way too much background noise and a windy day as well (we just don't have the microphone for this job).

This is the first time we've had to use ADR and we figured it was a good time to learn since we'll need it later on larger, more "serious" projects. The in-studio dialog we ended up with is what we have to go with due to time constraints on everyone involved, and like I said above it's not bad, it's just not "perfect".

...but thanks for the encouragement...

I think the problem is the fact that all but the problematic shot are close-ups, and the problem shot is a bit wider. I ended up having to submit it as-is (due to the deadline) but if we make it past round one I'll give it some more tweaking.

Thanks again everyone for your help!
__________________
Jason J. Gullickson
Producer
the second society
http://2soc.net
Jason J. Gullickson is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > All Things Audio


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network