|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 10th, 2010, 06:48 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 28
|
juicedlink vs beachtek?
I have enough money for both but if the beachtek can do better or just as good as juicedlink then why spend the other hundred dollars? Anyone with experience please let me know your opinions
|
|
|
|
December 10th, 2010, 08:08 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arcata, Ca
Posts: 750
|
JuicedLink has less noise. It's a quieter piece of gear. That's big.
Also JuicedLink can actually add gain, helping you to get your signal louder than the mic. Most Beachteck units are passive, meaning you can only turn the signal down from mic level. Another cool thing about JuicedLink is that they are switchable between mic and line level. Beachteck is only mic level. There are some tests on the JuicedLink YouTube page that show how much more hiss the Beachteks have.
__________________
My Work: http://www.youtube.com/ChadWork1 Sony FS5 :: Panasonic GH4 :: Sony PMW-EX1 :: FCPx :: AT4053b :: Rode NTG-3, |
|
|
|
|
December 11th, 2010, 01:10 AM
|
#3 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
You can watch my tests here and download uncompressed audio samples...
http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eo...-complete.html
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
|
|
|
December 11th, 2010, 01:54 AM
|
#4 |
|
Equal Opportunity Offender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,064
|
Also, make sure you view their explanatory tutorial videos on the Juiced Link site. And tell me that the sign-off bit at the end of the videos doesn't remind you of Ferris Bueller. (example here) :-P
Andrew |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
