|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 5th, 2010, 02:52 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 581
|
Audio Technica AT2020
I've got a RODE SVM mic I've used for over a year now. When off the camera it does a fair job but as many of you know I 've had major noise problems via stupidity on my part (leaving the IS on the lens running etc.
Yesterday I bought a ZOOM H4n and was looking for couple of bang for the buck XLR speakers that I could place on stands and run XLR back to the Zoom for recording. I ran across these mics and have heard a few good things about them. Anyone have good things to say about these? Looks like I can get two, 25ft XLR cables and stands all for around $200. Is this crap or a good deal? (I did a search here and didn't find much)
__________________
Nashville TN using Canon 5D MK3, Canon 550D, RODE SVM mic, 70-200 f2.8L II IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 and 85 f/1.8, Vegas Pro 11, Zoom H4n, Blackbird, Lilliput Monitor, Lightroom |
October 5th, 2010, 03:28 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Don't have any direct experience with those mics but AT makes some decent enough bargain mics so I would expect these to be okay. The main drawback is that they are side address large diaphram mics designed for relatively close vocal work, more at home in the studio than in a stereo pair for field recording where small diaphram end-address mics are usually preferred. Perhaps a pair of AT2021 would be better,
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
October 6th, 2010, 07:09 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 581
|
Steve I was ready to buy a couple until your post and looking for the 2021s I only see them available as a bundle pack for with the 2020. Argh. Also looking at the reception pattern on their website it looks exactly the same for some strange reason and the frequency response between the two mics looks very similar too. <<Harry enters his constant state of confusion>>
You're right I really would used these for micing an acoustic band or a chorus or a group of people on stage. One each to cover sound for it's half of the stage or set. Rather than the close up mics. With XLR balanced ouptputs 24v phantom if possible.
__________________
Nashville TN using Canon 5D MK3, Canon 550D, RODE SVM mic, 70-200 f2.8L II IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 and 85 f/1.8, Vegas Pro 11, Zoom H4n, Blackbird, Lilliput Monitor, Lightroom |
October 6th, 2010, 07:33 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
AT's website states 48v phantom for those mics. Often a mic can run on less but most times when the manufacturer supports use at less than the full 48 volts, they list the spec as a range, something like "12-52 volt phantom" or words to that effect. AT doesn't do that for these particular mics though they do for othe mics they offer.
There's a bit more to getting good stereo than just putting two mics near the stage. For a one-page summary of some different techniques, take a look at this pdf download from Schoeps ... http://schoeps.de/documents/stereo-r...chniques-e.pdf
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
October 7th, 2010, 07:57 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,238
|
Over on rec.audio.pro, the AT2020 is reputed to be a "sleeper". i.e. better performance than its budget price would suggest. OTOH, the AT2021 is essentially the same capsule in a different form-factor, so the AT2020 vs AT2021 game is simply cosmetic. I have a pair of AT2020 and they are nice mikes. For the kinds of things I do, however I would just as soon have the AT2021 form-factor as I convenience and flexibility are more important to me than cosmetics and appearance.
|
October 7th, 2010, 08:13 AM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Burlington
Posts: 1,976
|
Until recently the AT2021 was only available bundled with the AT2020, but it is now listed as a separate item. I suggest finding a good sale on the bundle and then if necessary sell the AT2020.
I found my combo kit on sale (also bundled with a preamp) and paid not much more than the original regular price of the AT2020 by itself a while back. |
October 7th, 2010, 11:42 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 581
|
So the 20 and the 21 are basically the same mic in different form factor? So for my purposes of setting up a mic on a stand say 8 feet from the talent to record several musicians with acoustic instruments eother of these mics would not work?
What would be the best mic for that kind of situation? The ZOOM's built in XY mike would prob be good but I kind of wanted to have the ZOOM closer to me and the camera for control and auditing the sound input with headphones.......
__________________
Nashville TN using Canon 5D MK3, Canon 550D, RODE SVM mic, 70-200 f2.8L II IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 and 85 f/1.8, Vegas Pro 11, Zoom H4n, Blackbird, Lilliput Monitor, Lightroom |
October 7th, 2010, 02:30 PM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Burlington
Posts: 1,976
|
Either would work in that situation since the AT2020 doesn't have a true large-diaphram design. That's another reason you might want to find the kit with both mics as a start, you could try them both out and decide, then buy a second copy of the one you think will be more useful to you.
I think it's unfortunate that AT dropped the AT3031, which was truly a great performing mic at around $170 each. They essentially replaced the AT3031 with the AT4021 ($250) above it and the AT2021 below it. |
October 7th, 2010, 03:23 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 581
|
Steve did preface this statement with the fact he had no experience with either when he said
"main drawback is that they are side address large diaphram mics designed for relatively close vocal work," But are you saying that these mics would be good for micing a few folks with instruments from about 6-10 ft away mic to talent?
__________________
Nashville TN using Canon 5D MK3, Canon 550D, RODE SVM mic, 70-200 f2.8L II IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 and 85 f/1.8, Vegas Pro 11, Zoom H4n, Blackbird, Lilliput Monitor, Lightroom |
October 7th, 2010, 05:06 PM | #10 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
BTW, I do concur with Jay on the 3031 - I also own a pair and am very pleased with them. I'd have recommended the 4021 except it's a bit over your budget.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
October 7th, 2010, 07:36 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 581
|
Not really over my budget. I just want most bang for the buck. But it's got to work first. appreciate the advice. So the a couple of 4021s would be good for micing a group of three musicials - two with acoustic guitars and one on upright bass about 10 feet away?
__________________
Nashville TN using Canon 5D MK3, Canon 550D, RODE SVM mic, 70-200 f2.8L II IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 and 85 f/1.8, Vegas Pro 11, Zoom H4n, Blackbird, Lilliput Monitor, Lightroom |
October 7th, 2010, 08:29 PM | #12 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,238
|
Quote:
Whether ANY mic will work at 8 feet (or any other distance) depends on a great many other factors besides the number of performers. The ambience of the room and the style of the music are major factors. We typically "tune" the microphone PLACEMENT (during rehearsal) to achieve the desired direct to ambience ratio for the recording style we are seeking. |
|
October 8th, 2010, 06:12 AM | #13 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
October 8th, 2010, 07:31 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 581
|
Thank you Steve for that explanation. I'm pretty much self taught in everything I do so I stay ignorant most of the time. It's kind folks like you that really help by explaning this stuff. Thanks!!
I'm copying your reply to a note on my iPhone now. So the 2020s wouldn't be that bad or do i need to get the 2041s. I guess I should just order the darn things and learn by experience but wanted to start out in best position I could. I know that the lenses I require are in the $1200 to $1900 for L glass. There are though a few gems out there for cheaper like the 85mm f1.8. I was hoping to start out with one of these cheaper gems as far as mics go - that's kinda where I was coming from. I didn't want to buy a crappy mic but wanted to get great value (who doesn't!). Sounds like ideally I'd mic everyone and every instrument as if it were a broadway play. ;-) When I shoot in amped music venues I'm really just micing the speakers so all of the distance stuff kinda flys out the window at that point I suppose. Wonder if there's an Audio for Dummies book.....hmmmm.......we have enough authors here..... :-)
__________________
Nashville TN using Canon 5D MK3, Canon 550D, RODE SVM mic, 70-200 f2.8L II IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 and 85 f/1.8, Vegas Pro 11, Zoom H4n, Blackbird, Lilliput Monitor, Lightroom |
October 8th, 2010, 07:44 AM | #15 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
IMHO, two absolutely must-have books are Jay Rose's "Producing Great Sound for Film & Video" and "Audio Postproduction for Film & Video," available from Jay's website or the usual source such as Amazon. Another reference I like that deals with techniques for booming, rigging lavs, practical mic placement, setting up mixers and gain staging, etc is "Location Audio Simplified" by S. Dean Miles.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
| ||||||
|
|