|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 13th, 2005, 10:29 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 393
|
Mackie or Alesis Firewire Mixer
I am looking into getting a new mixer. I am interested in getting the new Mackie 1620 (or 1640) or the Alesis firewire mixer. The problem is that the mackie cost twice as much as the alesis before you add the Mackie's optional fireward board (which adds another $400). So I was wondering if anyone has used either of these products and can recommend one over the other (keeping the price differences in mind ($400 vs. $1300)). I know that the alesis only does 48k while the mackie does 96, but otherwise I am not sure the quality difference justifies the price difference. I am going to be using it primarily for video related audio and some small band recordings (rock, reggae, R&B). There is no big rush, so if you all know of a better deal on the horizon then do tell.
|
July 13th, 2005, 11:45 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: France
Posts: 58
|
We have the Mackie. Love it. It's our fourth one in ten years.
|
July 13th, 2005, 11:58 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Ditto. Lotsa Mackie gear, and they build their own gear, not licensed from someone else. So, when you call the factory in Washington, you get to talk to the guys that make the stuff. The Onyx series stuff has Echo Audio engines in it too, and Echo tools are rock-solid. To get better, you need to look at Apogee, like the Rosetta series. For a lot more cash.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
July 13th, 2005, 12:27 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: France
Posts: 58
|
Don't do it, but I spilt a coke on mine about a month ago and nothing **repeat** nothing happened. Weird but true.
|
July 14th, 2005, 12:43 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 393
|
Sorry for the late response (business trip). So I guess I will be saving up for the Mackie. Frankly I like the Alesis (especially for the price) but the 48k limit really bothers me. I may wait a few months to see if anything comparable is due to come market (compared to mackie that is), but I can't wait much longer than that. Thanks guys.
|
July 14th, 2005, 12:51 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Having 24/96 is great, same with 24/192, but it's not something I'd sweat bullets over. It's likely going to be rare that you'll ever go past 48K, I'll wager.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
July 14th, 2005, 01:37 PM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,334
|
We have a 1640 in the studio with the FW card. We haven't yet used
the FW feature. The ONLY issue with the 1640 is a _tiny_ bit of cross talk, (varified at NAB) but with all the other features that isn't really a big issue. Nothing like the old Soundcraft 200B ;( Although I have not heard the Alesis, imo from having listened to Alesis's other offerings that the Mackie will easily best it. Remember that you usually get what you pay for. In audio this is even more true and when you are spending hard earned dough you don't want to pay half price and end up wishing you had spent the extra money. I would also bet that if you need to sell it the Mackie will sell fast. YMMV as always.
__________________
Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager |
| ||||||
|
|