|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 24th, 2005, 12:42 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 66
|
benefits of beachtek and similar XLR adaptors?
I am planning to use a wired lavalier AT803b with XLR connector attached to a camera without XLR connection (optura 50).
I found out i can use a Shure A96F XLR adapter/transformer ($40), or i can go for a Beachtek 2A for $120. I am asuming the Shure will allow you to have a balanced connection the same as the beachtek. What advantage would the beachtek give you over the shure connector? Volume control only? My question is: if you are using a canon optura 50 with manual audio control, do you really need the Beachtek? thank you max |
June 24th, 2005, 08:48 PM | #2 |
Fred Retread
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,227
|
You don't need the Beacktek for your setup. But the advantage of having one is increased versatility.
If you wanted to route the AT's signal to one channel and use a second mic for the other channel, the Beach would make that easy. If you wanted to take a line level signal in one or both channels, the Beach would make that easy.
__________________
"Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence..." - Calvin Coolidge "My brain is wired to want to know how other things are wired." - Me |
June 24th, 2005, 09:07 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clermont, FL.
Posts: 941
|
I prefer this one to the Beachtek because I like the belt mount format better than the under the camera format.
http://www.studio1productions.com/xlr-bp_pro.htm |
June 26th, 2005, 08:33 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 66
|
what's line level signal?
sorry for my ignorance: what's line level signal? Is that sound from a CD player for sintance? What's the purpose for that when you want to capture sound from interviewee?
thank you |
June 26th, 2005, 10:14 AM | #5 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|