|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 8th, 2005, 06:20 AM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
Ssssssssssss
I recently posted about doing voice over with
a shotgun, and how one woman popped the mic with her breath. Well, a different woman also used the mic, and the trouble here is her S's were quite pronounced, to the point that it is almost a distraction to the message she is giving with her spoken word. Is there anything that can be done in post to help out here? |
March 8th, 2005, 07:13 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Pop filter may help, if you're using a shotgun or large diaphragm, you can put a pipe cleaner in front of the mic, about an inch away, dead center.
Or, you can angle the mic differently from the corner of her mouth.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
March 8th, 2005, 11:54 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
What do you mean by "pipe cleaner"? And I've
heard of a "de-esser". Is that something related to this problem? |
March 8th, 2005, 12:33 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: stately Eldora Road
Posts: 386
|
A pipe cleaner's a 5- or 6-inch length of two twisted metal wires, fringed with short fuzz, meant to clean out the stem of a pipe. As in smoking (tobacco or whatever). They sell 'em at craft stores.
Am I the only one who suddenly feels like an old fart? |
March 8th, 2005, 12:47 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 932
|
A de-esser is very interesting tool, available as a hardware-based processor, usually part of a compressor-expander product, or as software algorithm in the form of a plug-in that can run inside an audio editing application program. The Waves de-esser is very good. They are often together with an equalizer to can increase high-frequency harmonics in a voice without saturating with sibilance from consonants. You can hear good de-essing and high frequency enhancement when you hear Norah Jones or similar pop vocals.
However de-essers are expensive and tricky to set up. Try playing around with the mic position to find one where the esses are less noticeable before delving into processing. You can also use a parametric equalizer to find the center of the "s" frequency and attenuate it a little bit, enough to keep the esses from going over the top without taking away too much sparkle. Also, ask her to be careful. Trained vocalists know how to "de-ess" themselves. Make sure she has adequate monitoring through headphones so she can tell when her esses are too loud.
__________________
Ignacio Rodríguez in the third world. @micronauta on Twitter. Main hardware: brain, eyes, hands. |
March 8th, 2005, 01:46 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 857
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Douglas Spotted Eagle : Pop filter may help, if you're using a shotgun or large diaphragm, you can put a pipe cleaner in front of the mic, about an inch away, dead center.
Or, you can angle the mic differently from the corner of her mouth. -->>> DSE, I'm not doubting you that a pipe cleaner will help, but can you expound on that. What does it do and how would you put it and inch away dead center from the mike? Does it run parallel or perpendicular to the shotgun. I know you'll know the wave-form theory that makes it work but can you dumb it down a little so I can understand it. And how come the more complex we get, there always seems to be some lore that does what all the high-tech stuff does, only better? DSE, your experience, and others like you, is invaluable to this community thanks for the continuing education (do you validate Continuing Education Credits?).
__________________
Fear No Weevil! |
March 10th, 2005, 05:28 PM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Re: Ssssssssssss
<<<-- Originally posted by Dave Largent : I recently posted about doing voice over with
a shotgun, and how one woman popped the mic with her breath. Well, a different woman also used the mic, and the trouble here is her S's were quite pronounced, to the point that it is almost a distraction to the message she is giving with her spoken word. Is there anything that can be done in post to help out here? -->>> For short sections, if you are using as nonlinear system with good controls, you can go in and reduce the volume on the overly sibilant sections by 6-8 db and that is usually enough. Regards, Ty Ford |
March 10th, 2005, 05:45 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Posts: 721
|
The sibilance control method is the best noted here. Proper monitoring headphones and the semi-pro will re-read the sentance. Pros with many years of experience will notice the "false-teeth-whistle" even without headphones and repeat the sentance immediately. So what does this mean for un-skilled voicers? The recording tech needs very good headphones and a special knack for directing the talent.
Perhaps experience will help you in your quest for recording voice, but to do this in post is certainly closing the gate after the horses have left the corral. The recording tech has to intervene at the time of recording. |
March 10th, 2005, 05:56 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 857
|
Pipe-Cleaner?
I would still like to know about the pipe-cleaner trick.
__________________
Fear No Weevil! |
March 10th, 2005, 07:17 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
You can always get away with doing the old pencil trick. Tape a pencil straight up in front of the diaphragm. It splits the air flow thus reduing pops. The cost of a pencil and tape.
A pipe cleaner does exactly the same thing, but some folks like em' in front of the diaphragm, and it can be used more easily on a shotgun than a pencil can, given the diameter of the barrel.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
| ||||||
|
|