|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 4th, 2004, 05:39 PM
|
#1 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,922
|
Schoeps MK4 compared to the MK41."
How is the MK4 compared to the MK41 and the quality of the figure 8 capsule
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ".......holy smokin rubber lips...what a ride!" |
|
|
|
June 5th, 2004, 02:23 AM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 126
|
Bryan,
I have to admit I haven't directly compared recordings made with the MK4 and Mk41, or compared the sound with the MK8. I will have to do some tests. Patrick |
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2004, 08:56 AM
|
#3 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,922
|
Do you use the cut 1?
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ".......holy smokin rubber lips...what a ride!" |
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2004, 01:10 PM
|
#4 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 126
|
Bryan
I don't have the Cut1. I do mainly music, indoors, and I don't want to lose the low frequencies. Patrick |
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2004, 02:03 PM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 126
|
Bryan
I have now compared the MK41 and MK4. The MK4 has a better sound (at least for classical music). Patrick |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
