|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 14th, 2009, 07:40 AM | #16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Karl - thank you for sharing your wisdom and experience. A lot to ponder indeed, definitely the reason I wanted to post on the board. My original thinking with the mics was to purchase quality but your are right on with your point with the wireless. They are a must have and buying more expensive mics without having the budget to get quality wireless doesn't do me much good. Mark mentioned the Lectro 100 series, you recommended the 200 or 400 series. Any specific reasoning on that? Admittedly, I've got to do my homework on the Lectros and wireless in general. The kind of film/tv projects are definitely smaller than that may sound, although I wouldn't be opposed to the larger projects, that's a long way off. Trying to do my best to put together a solid package of gear (that I wouldn't feel the urge to upgrade too quickly) and learn as much as possible. Most of what I put together on the list is gear that I would have liked to have had on previous work. No need for a second garage (at least not for sound equip) but would be fun to think about filling it up. Back to tinkering with the list... Thanks again! |
|
July 14th, 2009, 11:38 AM | #17 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Ok - did some digging on the Lectrosonics 100 and 200 series, seeing that 200 offers diversity. Everything I've read points to Lectrosonics as very reliable and solid, although saw that the 100 is more comparable to the Senn systems (at a much higher price). Question I have...has there been any feedback on the upcoming Sennheiser G3 wireless system? I've read good and bad regarding the G2, some saying that's probably the first rung of the pro ladder, others relying on it. Maybe the G3 will be another step up and worth for the release date in September before going for a more expensive product? I'm leaning toward the Tram50 or Countryman B6 lavs either way. Starting to lean a bit more toward the B6 for the ability to hide them. Would there be additional costs involved to allow for compatibility to the Senn G2/G3 systems? |
|
July 14th, 2009, 01:37 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bothell Washington
Posts: 174
|
Before upgrading to the Lectrosonics I used Sennheiser G2 units. The mics supplied with them were just ok, and I ended up buying better mics for the Sennheisers. Also the Lectrosonic 100 series is 50mw vs the Sennheisers 35mw power.
I also have a Countryman B6 in my kit, excellent sound and water proof. It works well for hiding but I find it gets lost under clothing. The Trams come with a complete mounting setup kit and I prefer it for mounting to the talents shirt or coat. The higher end Lectrosonics are deep pocket cash units, you will see them on any big budget movie set. |
July 14th, 2009, 01:57 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 82
|
The B6 is good to have but almost a specialty mic. Start with Trams, they're quick and easy to mount. They're not really great, but they became a standard somehow and do their job.
Generally: you want to work professionally you use professional tools, voila. |
July 14th, 2009, 02:14 PM | #20 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Regarding the specific lav, do you have a personal recommendation for a lav mic that sounds well when hidden? Sanken COS-11x's? I'd like to have a pair that could go either way (never the perfect solution I know) and still maintain quality sound. |
|
July 14th, 2009, 02:15 PM | #21 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
|
|
July 14th, 2009, 02:23 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 2,039
|
The AT 899 is a nice sounding mic, comes with a variety of mounts and a few bucks less than a Tram, though not as popular. IMO, it seems to hold up better than Trams'... cable gets pulled out of head and beyond repair.
I have not seen the new smaller AT-__ Lav, designed to compete with B6 I guess. |
July 14th, 2009, 02:28 PM | #23 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
I think I'm heading back to Dan Brockett's fine lav article this evening to do some more reading and listening. Seems like a daily mental back and forth with me. |
|
July 14th, 2009, 03:42 PM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 82
|
All lavs have deficiencies as far as I know. The TRAM is a standard because as I said it's quick and easy to mount - that's actually important - and it's a know quantity (quality) used pretty much everywhere. So you'll fit in. I have a few B6 and they really come in handy when there's no place to hide (Malibu beach movies i.e. not kidding) but they're a bit fragile and they don't like wind at all. As I said, specialty items if nothing else works. Sankens are fine and DPA's are fine - there's the AKG ck77 I think is awsome and so on. But really you shouldn't worry, go with the trams - other stuff comes later.
Last edited by Karl Lohninger; July 15th, 2009 at 11:45 AM. |
July 15th, 2009, 08:02 AM | #25 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|