|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 20th, 2004, 06:44 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Voorhees, NJ
Posts: 82
|
22k vs. 44k sound
aside from 22k whats the difference? Will I hear an observable quality difference?
What about as it relates to smartsound music? Thanks, KIM |
|
|
|
March 20th, 2004, 07:05 PM
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
you'll absolutely hear an observable difference, particularly on any decent set of speakers. Your high end will be pretty grainy, bottom end will be mushy. think of it as a 72 dpi image vs a 300 dpi image that has been zoomed by 150%
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
|
|
|
|
March 20th, 2004, 07:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 508
|
That's more than vivid enough. :D
|
|
|
|
|
March 20th, 2004, 07:28 PM
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
on the music side of things, sometimes we deliberately undersample at low bitrates and sample rates. This is really popular with rap music, to sample drum loops at a low rate to get a grainy, yucky feel, and then transition from the yuck to clean as an effect. That sort of thing is usually undersampled at 2 bit/16K
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
|
|
|
|
March 21st, 2004, 12:18 AM
|
#5 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
dont u just lurve crunchy 12khz kick drums :)
I woudl only use a lower sample rate if i was intending to overdub audio on teh camera itself.. but as its more efficient doing it in post i usually dont go near 22k.. |
|
|
|
|
March 21st, 2004, 12:21 AM
|
#6 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
by the way.. dv is actually 48k... cd is 44.1
dv allows 16bit or 12bit audio during recording |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
