|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
My 2 cents.
I just did a mic comparo with a Neumann. Five mics, and the Neumann wound up in last position, to my ears anyways. You may want to put off a purchase till you actually hear one. Just cuz someone says Neumann is the best, .... P.S. There are reasons why mic's wind up on the bottom of the heap in a mic comparo. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 173
|
Which ones came out on top Dave?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 936
|
Yeah Dave... now I'm in suspense! If you make a statement like that you gotta' throw us a bone here!
What were your findings/opinions and why? I almost backed out of my new purchase of the AT4073a when I spotted those two used Neumann kmr82i mics that were $700... The two reasons I stayed with the at4073a were: 1) recommendations and tons of "thumbs up" on that model. 2) I needed a short shot to replace the me66. But I gotta' tell ya'... I went back to that Neumann page a dozen times thinking, "Maybe I should just get the best since I could afford this and get the short shotgun later..."... Now you're giving me confidence that I made the right choice, but I'd love some more info... I'm not one of those guys who says something is good just because I bought it, and I also know there is better then what I can afford... so enlighten us! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
I've completed the tests of the mic's at 2-feet distance.
Today I'll be finishing up the 4-foot and 12-foot tests. Bryan and I currently have a compilation CD for sale for the low, low price of $7.99 ... Just kidding. I don't want to declare a winner until I complete all the testing. Right now I've done male speech. I will be testing with music also. I *can* tell you that the manufacturer's ratings for "sensitivity" are not accurate. For example, the Sennheiser ME64 and the Sanken CS-1 are rated the same by the manufacturers but they are far from the same. The ME64 was the most sensitive of the five mic's, with the CS-1 being on the other end of the spectrum. Matt, I'm not very familiar with the Neumann line. The Neumann mic that is in my "shoot out" is the KM 184. The others are the Audio Technicas AT4073 and AT4071, the Sanken CS-1, and the Sennheiser ME64. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
Guys, I'm starting the review.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 173
|
Dave, how do you test sensitivity?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
Record with the mic's at the same gain level and
and then check the recorded volume levels in an NLE. Actually, just listening to the recordings with your ears you can tell the louder ones from the softer ones. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: chicago, ill
Posts: 190
|
How scientific could this test be with such a limited amount of mics?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,922
|
Sharon If it doesn't sound good to us we don't care.
Between the two of us we've shared files on the Rode NT1A, NT3, NT5, Oktava 012, neumann ksm184, microtech gefell M300, me66, ME64, AKG D230, AKG C1000S, AT 4071, 4073, 4031, Sanken CS1. It's 100% more exposure than we would have had and we've included mics that we both have and use regularly, so we have a comparison. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
The Neumann is the only one that didn't come with
a carrying case, Sharon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: chicago, ill
Posts: 190
|
Love it I mean it Especially the case part.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|