|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium | Europe
Posts: 441
|
Sennheiser ew 100 G3 Series
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
Good, at last. I've been meaning to buy a second G2 receiver (as I have two G2 transmitting devices, the lav one and the SKP500 "Butt Plug" one) and was holding off until this...since we got an (accidental!) teaser that it was coming via a brief showing of it on their website in December 08.
Suppliers will start to sell the G2 series at a good discount now - I hope.
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chesterfield, VA
Posts: 63
|
Nice find! The ability to charge the accupacks in the case is a nice plus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Interesting. What do they mean by "adaptive diversity"?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 976
|
It's another name for "antenna diversity".
The camera-mount receiver is too small to be "true" diversity as that needs a second receiver inside (true diversity is two complete receivers feeding a single output stage). The G3 camera-mount receiver is the same size as the G2 - the second antenna is the output cable. It has a single RF section and a special circuit that monitors the two antennas and uses the one with the strongest signal. So it's a diversity receiver, but with the two antennas being switched between a single RF stage, rather than two antennas and two RF stages being switched at the output of the RF stage. It was deemed to be better this way for on-camera use, as it keeps the size of the receiver down.
__________________
John Willett - Sound-Link ProAudio and Circle Sound Services President: Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
So will this mean better range and/or less interference/drop outs etc. for G3's over G2's?
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 976
|
Yes - less drop-outs certainly, as it will switch to the second antenna if the main one drops low (and vice versa).
__________________
John Willett - Sound-Link ProAudio and Circle Sound Services President: Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Dang, this is looking sweet. I need to add more wireless to my kit, and these are looking pretty hard to resist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|