|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 6th, 2008, 11:52 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 976
|
The original FR-2 is actually very nice - I have used this for three years before I upgraded to the Nagra VI.
__________________
John Willett - Sound-Link ProAudio and Circle Sound Services President: Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons |
October 6th, 2008, 01:03 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Espoo Finland
Posts: 380
|
I also had FR-2 for some time, before realizing that it gives only 16-17 bits worth of dynamic range even at 24 bits*. Upgraded to SD722, which gives 20 at 24 bit sample depth. Worth remembering when getting all exited about 24/96, no field recorder gives more than 21 bits equivalent dynamic range in real life. All cheap ones basically just add 8 random bits to each sample when supposedly recording 24/96...
*) we should also be gratefull of honest 16/48 resolution. Better than human hearing or any playback equipment. Much better than any glorious analog Nagra of days past. 20 bits of real DR just makes levels setting safer, does not really improve the quality. |
October 6th, 2008, 02:58 PM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Exactly true. Not having to do another take because the actor screamed louder than expected can be worth it.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
| ||||||
|
|