|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 12th, 2008, 06:20 PM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
Welcome Jessie and good to hear that there is a new generation being trained to use fisher booms. I learned on mole richardson in 1980 and used fishers up until I copped out and went into post prod 1991.
I can still do it though as I was taught by the guys who invented TV when booms were the only option and lav mics didnt exist.
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
October 13th, 2008, 01:24 AM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chichester UK
Posts: 167
|
Welcome from me too, Jessie. Do I take it that you work chiefly in TV on multi camera shoots? It seems to me that that is the only place left not only where Fisher boom ops still flourish but also Lighting Directors who can light for them.
Boring story follows: I was told by a boom op that he had been working on a feature film in Africa. The crew was staying in a good hotel and one evening after shooting the sound maintenance man decided to strip down and clean the boom as some grit had got in it and it was getting noisy. Stripping down went ok, but reassembly proved to be a challenge. He was scratching his head next to a partially complete boom in the hotel's main lobby (the only area big enough for working on the boom) when a guy came up and offered help. None other than Mr. Fisher himself, on holiday! Job done in short time. Now, that is LUCK. Best wishes to yourself and all boom ops, Jess. |
October 13th, 2008, 09:54 AM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 25
|
All very interesting responses, but boom operators are not a dying breed. There is lots of work as a boom operator. Independent films, Hollywood films, and even sporting events like you know, the NFL use them. Documentaries use them all the time for ENG where you have very small crews. What technology has replaced boom operators? Lav mics are great, but not for every situation. I have not worked a shoot on a film, commercial or documentary that didn't have a boom operator. However in most cases the boom op was also the mixer.
|
October 13th, 2008, 10:44 AM | #19 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
Randy, the discussion here is about the MOUNTED boom system on a wheeled apparatus, not the handheld "dead cat on a stick".
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
October 13th, 2008, 12:00 PM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
Wayne
__________________
Mics: KMR 82 i, NTG-1, MKH418S, MKH8040, SR77, QTC1, QTC40, SR30 Recorder: Zaxcom Deva 5.8 & MIX-12. Wireless: TRX900 stereo, Lectro 411 |
|
October 13th, 2008, 12:13 PM | #21 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Sadly, in the gigs I get mixing and booming (even for narrative pieces) is expected and it is of course a major compromise. Recording 24 bit helps a lot, but in the end, there's still a fair amount of guesswork. All part of the ever downward spiral of quality I guess.
|
| ||||||
|
|