|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 53
|
Sound Devices 302 vs. Mixpre
If im gonna be working with only 2 microphones at a givin time, is there any reason why i should go Sound devices 302 over the mixpre? what are the differences?
Also, is it worth the mixer if i only have two tracks? Or should i plug the mics directly into a recorder? Third, whats a solid recorder that can record 2 tracks of 24bit audio from xlr sources? around 1000? Thanks, --Corwin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burbank
Posts: 1,811
|
The 302 has better/bigger meters, a number of additional features, up to five channels, etc.
But the quality of the sound (pre amps) should be the same. For a specific job or special requirements (size?), the mixpre is fine. For long term ownership, I would suggest the 302. It's more than worth the difference in price in this case. That's my opinion. I have the 302 and it has been put to more uses than I anticipated when I bought it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 456
|
Quote:
1. Price is paramount 2. You are not using low-output dynamic mics 3. You don't need extra features (headphone matrix, input/output limiters, stero/ms matrix linking, etc) 4. Battery life isn't a problem when running phantom power, LEDs, etc 5. The user interface is okay (smaller potentiometers, etc) http://www.sounddevices.com/products/302master.htm But I can't justify buying either, so who am I to say? Still, I'll probably wait until I can cough up enough to justify the SD302 someday... (simply for item #2 above). Regards, Michael |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 53
|
cool, Thanks!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
302
Ty Ford |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 2,211
|
Second the motion for 302
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 2,892
|
I had exactly the same question Mix-pre or 302. Finally decided with the Mix-pre I couldn't go bigger/forward/further/faster or cooler. Well maybe cooler.
So third for the 302. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 55
|
You'll want (and eventually need) the 302.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 53
|
Ok, i guess the plan is wait for the money, then go 302. Thanks!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
As a lower cost alternative, I am trying Sign Video's Eng44. I will see how the sound guy likes it after a shoot next week.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
|
I made a mixer mistake before (see above ..) but my new 302 is all I wanted in the first place. Just do it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Quote:
Regards, Ty Ford |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 53
|
Cool, good to know!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 26
|
If price is a factor and you want a mixer now, the MixPre resells very well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
OADE BROTHERS AUDIO Field Recording Experts, Sony, Tascam, Marantz, Fostex, Compact Flash recorders Works very well. Bernie |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|