|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 4th, 2008, 08:12 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Harvard, MA
Posts: 155
|
Sd302
Corwin,
The SD302 also allows for Middle & Side decoding if you need to have that facility. I have used the 302 for stereo recording in this mode; again, it's excellent..! I have found that as a general rule, with audio mixers, you invariably end up needing more channels, and whilst you have just two mics in mind now, you will, I am sure, soon find a situation where a third is required.. Rgds, Ross. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
__________________
XH-A1; HV-20; Miller DS-10; Manfrotto 695/3229; SD302/702; PCM-D50; FCS2; MacPro; 2.25TB |
August 4th, 2008, 10:33 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 456
|
Good for you, Corwin. When you start doing movies and high-end work making the big buck$, by all means step up to the pricey gear - one thing nice about audio ENG stuff, it depreciates slowly (unlike our cameras and computer gear). But for doc and narrative work, you'll do fine with prosumer gear until NPR comes knocking on your door...
Michael |
August 4th, 2008, 11:05 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 53
|
Haha, alright, sounds like a plan. Nothing for now.
Best, Corwin |
August 4th, 2008, 11:08 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
its kind of hard to not have a mixer with 3-4 inputs. once you have the inputs, you will use them, even if it means you borrow or rent a mic on occasion. having a mixer also mean being able to feed 2 cameras, or camera + audio recorder without splitting the lines. however, if you can only spend $2k max, its really out of your budget unless you come into something used that works ok for a very good price. I think running straight to the camera would probably be your choice if the preamps are reasonably clean.
as for choice in mics, another to consider is selling the me66 and getting a AKG blueine CK300+MK93 hypercardiod. its an impressive mic for under $400 G2 wireless and just run with the mic included for now. $500. a cos11 is $350, a sonotrim ( better version of a tram ) is in the same range a rycote S series suspension and zeppling $350-$375 depending on size. some XLR cables, decent set of cans $250-$300 at this point you are near the top of your budget. a boom boy + C stand could be a couple more items to add. add the mixer in down the road. at least with mid range good mics you'll get the most bang for the buck. down the road you can sell them, or keep them as backups when you finally get a CMC641 :) |
August 5th, 2008, 07:21 AM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tartu, Estonia
Posts: 579
|
How bad would documentary interviewing sound without the mixer/limiters?
I mean maybe an ATW1800 series dual wireless system would cut it as it can mix two channels to one just add a third wired one and. And I mean for one man band - as the less equipment to set up the better. T |
August 5th, 2008, 11:19 AM | #21 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
probably be just fine if the camera pre amps are ok. you need to test them. if the wireless unit sends line level, use that. the question is, does the camera pre amps work at mic level and simply attenuate line level down :( or work at line level where they would be quieter, and boost mic level to line as real pre amps should.
I shot for many many years without a mixer, just mounting 2 wireless onto the camera, or running the hardwire directly in. of course I was also shooting betaSP where the analog recording was more of a limitation then the pre amps, but some how we all lived, had decent sound, and got paid. most cameras have limiters of some sort. limiters should only be used to contain unexpected peaks, not as a sort of automatic level control. so getting levels basically correct should be your first goal. last week I did a shoot were I mic'd this guy up. as I am wiring him, I trimmed out the transmitter by asking him to speak. as soon as we start to shoot, this guy was literally 3X louder ! I stopped the take, turned the pak down a little, turned the mixer down a bit, and had his bits done in 10 minutes. can't be afraid to stop a take in the very beginning if its wrong. if you are really worried about this, always ask a throw away question like their name, how to spell it, or a question you plan to ask worded differently later on. |
August 6th, 2008, 08:17 AM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dayton, TN (USA)
Posts: 219
|
Yes, you can...
|
August 6th, 2008, 08:19 AM | #23 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
I sent you an email about the Provider lav mic. Did you receive it? Regards, Bernie |
|
August 7th, 2008, 01:18 AM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 456
|
Yes, Bernie - I received your most recent EMAIL and responded:
Hi Bernie, Yes, I've always felt the Countryman B6 (and E6) were great mics. I was surprised when an online distributor suggested the Provider Series was as good for a third of the price. Since I use Sennheiser G2's (compatible connector) and the price was soooo good, I thought I'd give it a try. In fact, the distributor said I could always return them if I didn't agree they were equals to the Countryman B6. I gave it a try and indeed, the sound, size, durability, etc seem equivalent. In fact, the Provider Series even has an attrative case that looks like my Countrymans! Even the size is pretty much the same size and I don't think one is better than the other as far as under-clothing noise. I haven't met your friend Paul - he isn't a member of our local professional videographer group. At least I don't think I've crossed paths with him yet. But yes, George Lucas presence is certainly felt in the area (Star Wars, American Grafitti, etc). Happy Trails, Michael |
| ||||||
|
|