|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 23rd, 2008, 08:35 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 89
|
Booming and Mixing.. simultaneously ?
Seems like I can do one or the other, but recently had to do both on an indie film, and ran into troubles.
If I have to hold an extended boom overhead, how am I supposed to let go with one hand to tweak levels on my device? (silent controls on the pole itself would've been ideal, lol) Can most one man sound guys let go with one hand, holding a 14' extended pole over head with mic and zeppelin, and with the other hand.. change a level, then go 2-handed again while keeping the mic steady the whole time? Should I hit the gym? How is this mixing and booming technique done ? |
April 23rd, 2008, 09:30 PM | #2 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
Quote:
Dan |
|
April 24th, 2008, 01:23 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 185
|
What Dan says.
However on the shoots/days where I have no boom op, I insist on a full rehearsal (even if it's shot) to ensure I can get good sound. I wouldn't even try and bother to ride the gain whilst booming, but rely instead on the SNR/dynamics of doing 24-bit and the Sound Devices limiters should anything unexpected happen. Minor limiting I let slide. It goes without saying, mixing boom and multi-channel lavs whilst booming ... improbable. Ideally though, what Dan says.
__________________
---8<--- |
April 24th, 2008, 05:15 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 536
|
Short answer "yes." A good sound guy can manage a 3-4 channel mixer, 2-4 wireless mics and a boom all at the same time. That's what they get paid for and that's why it's a considered a skill.
__________________
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether you believe it or not." Neil deGrasse Tyson https://www.nautilusproductions.com/ |
April 24th, 2008, 06:04 AM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
A good sound guy? You mean, like, one who has his DNA spliced with an octopus? (Those sucker things would be great, but not so sure about having testicles in my head).
__________________
---8<--- |
|
April 24th, 2008, 07:03 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Rick's comment, I think, is based on those times when there aren't rapidly changing volume levels and lots of channel ducking, or, if you're isoing everything to a multi-track.
I do location audio work. I think one person with four wireless, a mixer and operating a boom all at the same time is a recipe for disaster. Regards, Ty Ford |
April 24th, 2008, 07:23 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
I mirror Ty's thoughts on this one. When people hire me for shoots without a boom op (normal for interviews/docs/some commercials), they know that when I deliver the media to them with the audio, they will have work to do on the ISO tracks. They do get a 'mix' on-location to the camera, but that's really just to use as their guide track, it's way too hard to keep 4 wireless and a boom going with just one person.
The real problem is nobody wants to pay for a two person sound crew anymore. The major networks are even trying to cut out as much as they can from shoots and the sound crew is always on that list. In fact, they really want indie camera people who can do the whole thing, but that's another story. The bottom line is it's a tough job, and it is a skill. That's why people get paid to do it. Wayne
__________________
Mics: KMR 82 i, NTG-1, MKH418S, MKH8040, SR77, QTC1, QTC40, SR30 Recorder: Zaxcom Deva 5.8 & MIX-12. Wireless: TRX900 stereo, Lectro 411 Last edited by Wayne Brissette; April 24th, 2008 at 10:01 AM. |
April 24th, 2008, 04:05 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 89
|
cool. thnks for the replies. Guess I could always get a film student to boom for cheap or free if low-budget. If alone, what about multi-track recording at set levels, leaving the fades and mixdown for post? Is this something that is commonly acceptable?
|
April 24th, 2008, 04:31 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Last time I had a student try to boom, that person just didn't get it. Amazing to me at first. With them holding the boom, I'd steer them to the right position. 20 seconds later they'd be off again.
Regards, Ty Ford |
April 24th, 2008, 04:55 PM | #10 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Quote:
Net result was my having to spend 50 hours on ADR, sound editing and foley, all for a 3 minute film. Quite the learning lesson. Agreed also about the baffling lack of intuition about booming that is out there. When I was running Instant Films (weekend filmmaking challenge), I'd visit set after set and more often than not witness a young boom guy positioned halfway between the set and craft service with the mike pointed vaguely in the direction of the actors.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
|
April 24th, 2008, 05:38 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bristol U.K.
Posts: 244
|
Let's not forget how good we are... Most lay people can not tell the difference between a mic on target and it's polar opposite. Neither can a lot of people who should know better. Unfortunately 95% of students and work experience people are non starters in audio. After all if you had to do a course at age 20 + then you have missed the best learning years, the 10-18 age when talent emerges. Is it just me that thinks that once upon a time being a sound'man' was something one became without trying, an unavoidable natural progression from childhood to a job. A 'career'.
|
April 24th, 2008, 06:00 PM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
I was having a "bad day" several years ago when a friend from long ago called. After I told him what I had been up to all these years, he said, "Wow, so you umade a career out of what you really were having fun doing (audio) when we were kids. How cool is that?"
I thanked him for turning my day around. Regards, Ty Ford |
April 25th, 2008, 03:48 AM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
I think part of the problem is the sound crew is almost always the lest understood on set. I also think because we don't have a camera or don't desire to have a camera, film people don't get it. It's also interesting to me how a lot of sound mixers got into the business. Few knew early on that's what they wanted to do (myself included), most enjoyed some aspect of audio, but usually some event is what forced them into it. Not that it's a bad thing to have happen, but I'm just not sure you can say they didn't have to try, but most still love their "job". Wayne
__________________
Mics: KMR 82 i, NTG-1, MKH418S, MKH8040, SR77, QTC1, QTC40, SR30 Recorder: Zaxcom Deva 5.8 & MIX-12. Wireless: TRX900 stereo, Lectro 411 |
|
April 25th, 2008, 06:50 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Olney, Maryland
Posts: 197
|
|
April 25th, 2008, 08:12 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
Jim's quote made me re-read the original question... One item that does help when doing solo mixing/booming is the Kit Cool. I have one (although I've probably only used it a half a dozen times), and it does work...
http://atscomms.com/Sales/Products/C.../kit_cool.html Might be worth looking at. Wayne
__________________
Mics: KMR 82 i, NTG-1, MKH418S, MKH8040, SR77, QTC1, QTC40, SR30 Recorder: Zaxcom Deva 5.8 & MIX-12. Wireless: TRX900 stereo, Lectro 411 |
| ||||||
|
|