|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 18th, 2008, 01:47 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fremont California
Posts: 27
|
An idiot's guide to audio issues
First, let me preface my questions with the provisio that I have read the threads in the FAQ. Sadly, while they have been helpful in many ways, I find I lack even a basic foundation that many of them seem to assume the reader will posses. Thus, I wonder if anyone can direct me to sort of an "idiot's guide" to film audio.
What I'm looking for, more or less, is a sort of checklist of things to do to or not do to minimize the amount of screw-ups I make. Now, as I only make films for fun, and I enjoy it as a learning process, I'm not looking to get everything right away. But some pointers would be nice. On to specific questions: 1) A few minutes here, on wikipedia, and elsewhere on the web has confirmed my suspicions that the abbreviations db and khz used here stand for decibel and kilohertz. I know that high frequency sounds have higher khz that lower ones, and I know decibels are a system of volume measurement. What I don't know is why the values people use matter. I have read in other threads that some people suggest a -12db baseline for audio. Why is that? What does that mean? Are you lowering the default intake volume, or is "negative" negative in some sense other than "reality" (if reality is 0). 2) How do you use a mixer? I've rented a Shure mixer before from the local gear shop just to play around with it, but I don't really know how it works. What can a mixer control? Are there some default settings for simple dialog scenes someone can point me to? What are some of the things I should be looking for the next time I have a mixer in my hands? 3) Boom Technique: I have read elsewhere that boom operation is a complicated skill, and having tried my hand at it a few times during the last film I made, I can believe it. My new project consists mostly of different scenes with different locations with two speakers. Should I look to record each audio twice, with the boom pointed towards one each time? Sorry for the length. Any suggestions would be much appreciated, on the three topics above, or really anything you think might help a total audio novice. |
April 18th, 2008, 04:51 AM | #2 | |||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Hope this helps
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|||
April 18th, 2008, 04:52 AM | #3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
http://www.locationaudiosimplified.com/ Nothing comes close to this book. Wayne
__________________
Mics: KMR 82 i, NTG-1, MKH418S, MKH8040, SR77, QTC1, QTC40, SR30 Recorder: Zaxcom Deva 5.8 & MIX-12. Wireless: TRX900 stereo, Lectro 411 |
|
April 18th, 2008, 09:58 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: McLean, VA United States
Posts: 749
|
dB is the abbreviation for decibels with the bel (named after Alexander Graham) being a unit representing a factor of 10 in power thus a 10 milliwatt signal is 1 bel (equal 10 decibels) stronger than a 1 milliwatt signal. To compute decibels one takes the logarithm of the ratio of two powers being compared and multiplies by 10. In comparing the 10 mW signal to the 1 mW signal the dB = log(10/1) = log (10) =1. If, OTOH, we are referencing to the 10 mw signal the formula is log(1/10) = log(0.1) = -1. The minus sign thus comes from the properties of logarithms. Changing from higher to lower power always gives negative decibels which should be intuitively pleasing. You may wish to play around with logarithms in Excel to gain some insight here. Note that if the comparison is made with voltages or counts out of an A/D converter the db formula uses 20 times the log because power (watts or quatloos) is proportional to the square of the volts or counts.
Hz, kHz may be easier to understand if they were called by their original names "cycles per second" or "kilocycles per second" which is the number of times the sound pressure wave, its electrical or digital representation cyles from positive to negative in one second. Heinrich Hertz was the first to transmit radio waves and so the IRE began to replace cps (cycles per second) by the unit "Hertz" some time in the 50's or 60's (if I remember correctly). |
April 18th, 2008, 11:56 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 563
|
Quote:
- Martin
__________________
Martin Pauly |
|
April 18th, 2008, 01:11 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: McLean, VA United States
Posts: 749
|
One dB is generally considered to be about the minimum discernable change in loudness. That's why we use decibels instead of bels. The ear responds logarithmically (as does the eye and probably the nose...) so while a doubling of power produces a sound which carries twice as much energy per unit time the loudness change is 10*log(2) = 3 dB which is about 3 times the minimum detectable level and the change will not seem that great. 3 dB is generally considered to be the level change which is readily discernable. If I recall from way back in my radio days the steps on the faders were 2dB - you couldn't really hear the change of one step unless listening carefully to a test signal. Today my surround system volume control displays half dB steps. Ridiculous! Well, maybe not from a marketing POV.
|
April 20th, 2008, 04:41 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow. Scotland
Posts: 79
|
|
April 23rd, 2008, 06:18 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Palm Beach, Florida USA
Posts: 99
|
Too many people on the web want an instant-gratification answer,
when the scope of what you're asking is WAY too broad. You're not going to get far in high-technology hobbies by trying to keep up with scattered web answers that you can't organize and get back to.... You need to keep a couple of good reference books in your library (and if you don't already have a library, START ONE!) |
April 23rd, 2008, 07:01 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: McLean, VA United States
Posts: 749
|
In answering about what the minus means I completely overlooked the basic question. The optimum (in the sense of maximum NPR or signal to noise ratio) "loading" for an A/D converter when the input signal is Gaussian is acheived when the RMS voltage is approximately 12 dB (the actual number depends on the number of bits the converter is capable of) below the voltage which saturates the A/D. With digital equipment dB are often referred to this "full scale" voltage. Thus -12 dBFS is close to the ideal load (for Gaussian signals). Note that a pure tone is not Gaussian and the ideal load for it is -3 dBFS. Note also that speech is not Gaussian. The ideal load is that which never reaches 0 dB fs. Music is more Gaussian simply because there are usually several voices. A sum of signals tends to be Gaussian.
|
April 24th, 2008, 05:00 PM | #10 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Quote:
Regards, Ty Ford |
|
April 26th, 2008, 09:55 AM | #11 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 9
|
I second "Location Audio Simplifed". It has a lot of great info on location recording. One of the best books I have (and I have them all) is Audio in Media by Stanley R. Alten. It was one of my text books when I was going to school for broadcasting. It covers a huge amount of information and is well written. It's quite expensive but you might be able to find it used.
|
April 27th, 2008, 12:46 PM | #12 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fremont California
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
As for everyone else, I appreciate the useful replies. I will definitely be looking into the resources suggested. |
|
| ||||||
|
|