|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 27th, 2008, 10:35 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 325
|
Wireless Lav help needed
I'm looking to get my first wireless lav and I'm really confused on all the technical things I need to know
I'm looking at the Samson Airline Series due to the very small size (I shoot with a very compact setup of 2 SONY HC7's). I want something small, but my budget just wont' allow anything costing more money. I'm confused about Frequency - B&H offers the same setup with each one having one of five different frequencies. I'm staying here in the states, and I have no idea if one frequency is preferred over another. The mic setup is UHF which I assume is a better route to go over VHF - but please correct me if I'm wrong. Please - I need to purchase one soon for some upcoming work and I have no idea what to get. TIA, |
March 27th, 2008, 10:41 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
Off the wall suggestion, take a look at the Sony Bluetooth HW1 mic - you can run two side by side, and they go right into the dedicated shoe (plus will do 5.1 surround on later Sony AVCHD models!).
UHF is preferred, but VHF is an option if on a budget, but I've switched over to the HW1's having used both, with a couple irivers with lavs for backup. |
March 28th, 2008, 03:27 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
the mic/transmitter is fairly small on the Sony unit, not as small as a lav mic, but still pretty easy to camouflage. I've contemplated hacking an external lav input into mine, but the xmiter is so small, no place for a jack!
|
March 28th, 2008, 04:32 AM | #5 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
Do you really need wireless? People tend to equate lav mics with wireless rigs but they actually are separate considerations. If you're doing sit down interviews, etc, where the subject isn't actually moving around in the location rather than dramatic action and aren't using wide framing showing the floor between you and the subject, a hard-wired lav on the subject with a discretely placed cable going to the camera or recorder is far preferred over almost any wireless setup. Wireless is actually the option of last resort for when the circumstances of the shoot leaves just no other way to go about it. About the only thing lower in the list is a shotgun mounted on the camera or the stock in-camera mic. You get what you pay for, especially in wireless. About the minimum that has the quality and flexibility needed for other than casual consumer-level hobby shooting would be something like the popular Sennheiser G2 series. But you have to move up into the top-shelf class where a transmitter/receiver pair costs several kilobucks before you get sound quality equal to what you get with a $50 piece of Star-Quad mic cable and even they're not foolproof in all locations.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
March 28th, 2008, 06:42 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 111
|
Hi Cliff,
Steve made a good point. For what you're paying for a Samson Airline series, you could invest that in a good hard wired lav. No batteries, no interference, no drop out. If you gotta have wireless, the Sennheiser G2 series is the minimum. |
March 28th, 2008, 07:31 AM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 325
|
Steve - I would prefer not to deal with a wireless lav. A production company is offering me some freelance work and that work requires mobility while interviewing business owners and I do not have the option (or budget) to bring a second person to run a boom mic. Hence my question. For me personally, I would prefer to stick with my wired lav as I know there are no issues using it, but the company hiring me states in the equipment list requirements:
Quote:
Dave - what is the sound quality you're getting with the bluetooth setup? Do you find it to be in the same league as traditional wireless lavs like the Sennheiser? I'm trying to find a short term solution until the income from these shoots pays for a better wireless lav setup. I'll have to see what I can come up with. Maybe someone out there has some creative solutions as a workaround for the interim. |
|
March 28th, 2008, 08:19 AM | #8 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
I shudder when I look at the specs for the HW1 mic from Sony. Twelve specifications listed dealing with the size, weight, what the case is made of, the temperature you can store it at, the battery it takes, etc, and not one single word about its audio or electrical performance! It might work great but you'd never know that from looking at the info sheet.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! Last edited by Steve House; March 28th, 2008 at 09:00 AM. |
|
March 28th, 2008, 08:27 AM | #9 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,065
|
Quote:
Just be careful when you get a system to check your frequency charts the best you can, and then immediately go around your area and test it within your 'return' window.
__________________
What happens if I push the 'Red' button? |
|
March 28th, 2008, 08:37 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 325
|
I see why hard wired mics are the preferred way to go (and why I prefer them). I'm going to check with my contact and see if a wireless lav is a must or an option - I would much prefer to work with a wired setup - They are simple and you know what you are getting with one as long as you work within it's limitations. I may see if I can rent one locally, although the size of city I live in doesn't have a true rental house so to speak.
|
March 28th, 2008, 09:09 AM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Cliff, I have that Samson Airline wireless setup. Transmitter has a built-in mic (and a plug for a lav) and runs from a single AAA cell. Receiver looks the same but without the mic.
Performance on my FX1 is very good indeed. I have a Senheisser G1 radio mic set-up on my Z1 and this cost hundreds more - yet is hardly any better. Go ahead, I think you'll be impressed. tom. |
March 28th, 2008, 09:09 AM | #12 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
March 28th, 2008, 09:14 AM | #13 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
March 28th, 2008, 09:19 AM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Spot on Steve, but Cliff's hit financial and time constraints as you'll see from his posts. I've had the Airline kit for a few years and never had a problem. At the price the system sells for it's a steal. Just thought I'd pass on the news.
|
March 28th, 2008, 09:25 AM | #15 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
If it was for hobby or student use I'd agree with you but this is for a paying gig. He can't afford cheap. While it might work just fine for him, IMHO he ought not take the risk.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
| ||||||
|
|