|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 8th, 2008, 05:30 PM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Easiest way to send scratch track using SD702t
What's the easiest way to send a scratch track to a camera while using the SD302, SD702t combo? Do I want to try and feed the 702t from the 302's tape outs (and use the regular XLR outputs to feed the camera), or do I want do some kind of pass through with the 702t and connect the camera to it? I've checked out SD's site, hoping for some kind of linking cable like they have to connect mixers, but there doesn't seem to be anything.
|
February 8th, 2008, 06:35 PM | #2 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
|
|
February 8th, 2008, 09:44 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,259
|
Marco,
I'm going to be working on this very problem this weekend. But I suggest you give SD a call on Monday (if I don't have an answer for you by then). FWIW, I would go with their cables--if they have one. They are top notch and you'll know they work and you're only looking at saving ~$20. But I imagine it's going to be a reasonably standard cable. I believe the 702T has a passthrough split output that is not delayed, as well as one that is delayed by first going through the recording process. May I as what NLE you're using? B/c if it's Avid, you can send the timecode from the 702T to the other audio track. Avid will recoginze this as timecode. P.S. I remeber thinking about trying to send the monitoring signal off the 302 to the camera and monitoring off the recorder, or something like that. But I honestly don't think it's necessary. |
February 8th, 2008, 09:45 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
".. just make the cable yourself.."
Yeah, clearly I need to acquire those kinds of skills, but in the meantime I'm looking for a premade product. I see that the 702T has two line-level analog outputs with TA3M (male?) connectors. Can I buy an adapter that will get me to standard XLR? |
February 8th, 2008, 09:51 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Ah Peter. I guess I'm looking for their XL-2 model number cable.
http://www.sounddevices.com/products...ies.htm#cables Editor is using Final Cut, but this is not a timecode production. Cool tip about sending timecode to one track though. |
February 8th, 2008, 10:00 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 186
|
|
February 8th, 2008, 10:01 PM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Also this. I love Remote Audio cables. So pretty.
http://www.trewaudio.com/store/produ...cat=123&page=1 They also offer a mic level cable. What's the difference? Is it an attenuating cable or something? http://www.trewaudio.com/store/produ...cat=123&page=1 |
February 8th, 2008, 10:03 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Thanks Jeffrey. Next question I guess, do I really want to go from the tape out on the 302 to professional line in on the 702T. Bound to lose some quality there, aren't I?
|
February 9th, 2008, 05:57 AM | #9 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
Remember that the Tape Out of the 302 is fixed at a level of -15dBu. I expect that's going to be too low for the 702 line level and too hot for the 702 mic level. I'd suggest sending the mixer main outs to the recorder main inputs and then from there either the recorder's XLR out (for a nominal 0dBu level) or Tape Out (for a nominal -10dBv level) on to the camera. When you set the Output Source Selector to "Input1, Input2" you're in a pass-thru mode where the input signals are always sent to the outputs regardless of whether you're rolling. Either that or send the 302 Tape OUt to the camera since that's just a scratch track. (Or I could come down as a sound utility and bring my 442 along <grin>)
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
February 9th, 2008, 09:28 AM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
If you do decide to go through the outputs on the recorder, make sure you turn everything off on the front-end when you're sending tone to the camera. I've seen that happen (not to me :D) when post calls and says they can hear people talking during tone. :P |
|
February 9th, 2008, 10:11 AM | #11 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
February 9th, 2008, 11:17 AM | #12 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
|
|
February 9th, 2008, 11:23 AM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Harvard, MA
Posts: 155
|
I have the SD302 + SD702. You can set the SD702 for Line input, and set the SD302 XLR outs at Line (default setting). Then send the XLR outs from the SD302 to the XLR inputs on the SD702. Send a 1kHz test tone from the 302 to the 702 and set the input levels via the 702's Input level knobs. Then push the knobs in and leave them there. The led meters on both pieces of gear should now be nicely aligned; i.e. '-20' on the 302 show also show -20 on the 702.
From the TA3 outs on the 702 (you can use the XL2 cable from SD) take that to your camera and set the camera inputs to Line. In my workflow I also engage the Limiters on the 302; that way I'll never send a clipped signal to the 702. Rgds, Ross. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
February 9th, 2008, 11:59 AM | #14 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
1: 302 main out to 702 inputs, 302 tape out to camera 2: 302 tape out to 702 inputs, 302 main out to camera 3: 302 main out to 702 inputs, 702 output (either main or tape) to camera, 702's inputs routed direct to outputs. Marco didn't say what camera he was using but most prosumer cams have line level inputs that are 'consumer' -10dBv line level so I'd opt for number 1 as the most viable, number 3 as second.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
February 9th, 2008, 01:18 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Harvard, MA
Posts: 155
|
Steve, I'd opt for your #3 - using main outs from the 702 rather than tape outs. You can then use the tape out on the 702 as a monitor feed if required..
If the plan is to get better audio (say 24bit / 48k) by recording onto the 702 and just put a scratch track onto the camera, then why would you send tape outs from the 302 to the 702? Best is to send XLR (Line level) out from the 302 to the 702's Inputs (set at Line level). At this point gain stages are nicely matched, and really good audio can get onto the 702. I'd then use the TA3 outputs on the 702 to go to camera set at Line level (OK, we don't know what the camera type is...). If required you can attenuate the 702's outputs by up to 40dB in 1dB increments.. This arrangement works great for my XH-A1.. Rgds, Ross. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| ||||||
|
|