|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 28th, 2008, 04:59 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 245
|
cleaning sound
Hello to all,
Just wondering if any of you experts can tell me how much I can repair/clean audio with background noise and what the best application might be for this purpose. I've had a little look at Adobe Audition but to be honest I'm not really sure what a lot of it does. I'm trying to get some clean dialogue between two actors. Thanks in advance, Greg. |
January 28th, 2008, 05:10 PM | #2 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
January 28th, 2008, 07:47 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
I recently did an industrial video where we held an "interview" inside a moving car down the freeway (boy was that "fun".... not!). I had the pleasure of cleaning it up when we were done with it. I was able to clean it up quite well using Izotope's RX product. I also own SoundSoap, but found Izotope's product seemed to work much better. It still wasn't magic and I had to work at it, but in the end, we go very usable audio that fits in perfectly in the moving car. The downside is the product cost $349 USD, so it's not super cheap, but depending on what you are trying to clean up, this might be just the ticket.
Wayne
__________________
Mics: KMR 82 i, NTG-1, MKH418S, MKH8040, SR77, QTC1, QTC40, SR30 Recorder: Zaxcom Deva 5.8 & MIX-12. Wireless: TRX900 stereo, Lectro 411 |
January 29th, 2008, 09:42 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 563
|
Quote:
By any chance, did you have an opportunity to compare the standard version of RX with the "Advanced" version? I am curious if the enormous price difference is justified. Thanks, Martin
__________________
Martin Pauly |
|
January 29th, 2008, 09:47 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
Wayne
__________________
Mics: KMR 82 i, NTG-1, MKH418S, MKH8040, SR77, QTC1, QTC40, SR30 Recorder: Zaxcom Deva 5.8 & MIX-12. Wireless: TRX900 stereo, Lectro 411 |
|
January 29th, 2008, 04:36 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 245
|
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the input. I guess I should of been more specific. I think 90% of the audio that needs attention either has vehichle or aircraft background noise in it. Do either of these count as constant. I can't make up my mind. I've had a quick go at this with the trial Adobe Audition but have found my initial results dissapointong as it changes the actors voices too much. However I'm a beginner at this sort of stuff so it's probably a case giving it a few more tries. Has anyone got any good tips? Also, might it be a case that once i have eliminated the unwanted sound I then need to re-embelish the actors voices with the same software (although, I wouldn't know where to start with that).Thinking about it I guess that's is what they call sound design? Thanks in advance, Greg. |
January 29th, 2008, 05:58 PM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
Find areas of the track that have the undesired noise only and sample it for removal in your noise reduction software. Unless it's really broad-band and obtrusive you should be able to reduce it signifigantly without affecting the desired elements too much. Izotrope Rx is available for a free trial download - you either can't save the result or it puts beeps into it but downloading the trial would let you experiment to see if it'll take care of your problem before committing any money to it. Give it a shot and see what happens.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
January 31st, 2008, 09:14 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 245
|
Thanks Steve,
A wealth of knowledge as usual. Would you happen to know if I could do this with Adobe Audition or would I be better sticking to Izitrope as you suggested. As I said before I have very little experience in this field and I'm not sure yet how much I can get out of the Audition software. Thanks again, Greg. |
January 31st, 2008, 10:50 AM | #9 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
There's a bit of a learning curve with each and the two products compliment each other well. Best thing I can suggest is to experiment a bit with both of them.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
February 1st, 2008, 05:07 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 245
|
Many thanks Steve. I actually meant to ask a couple of other question but they didn't post for some reason. However, I'm going to look into this a little on my own first ( do a bit of the leg work as they say.) and stop pestering you
Many Thanks again mate, Greg. |
February 1st, 2008, 05:43 PM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
Audition can do some amazing cleanup if :
you need to learn to use spectral view, and remove noise only where its most objectionable learn to do it in several small steps rather then one large one. gentle does it have patience when doing it. learn to use AU's noise removal tools. its an hour or two in the manual and just playing with it should get you going. |
February 3rd, 2008, 07:00 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 245
|
Thanks Steve that sounds promosing I shall stick with it.
Greg |
| ||||||
|
|