Rode SM-3 vs SM-5 at DVinfo.net

Stephen Sobel · August 26th, 2007, 06:21 PM

I'm considering the Rode NGT-1 or NGT-2 for the Canon XH-A1 camcorder. Which shockmount would work best, the Rode SM-3 or the Rode SM-5?

Edward Carlson · August 26th, 2007, 07:28 PM

I would go for the SM-3. The SM-5 can't mount to a boom pole, only to the clamp (without taking the thing apart). I actually fabricated a clamp adapter of my own out of a dowel rod. I later replaced my clamp altogether with a second shoe mount, one for the SM-3 and the other for my wireless receiver.

Stephen Sobel · August 26th, 2007, 07:48 PM

Assuming I don't want to use a boom pole - how does the SM-5 attach to the clamp? How does the SM-3 attach to the camcorder?

Edward Carlson · August 26th, 2007, 08:33 PM

The SM-3 uses the shoe mount, or a boom pole mount. If remove the actual shock mount from the shoe mount by removing two screws, you also have a 1/4-20 hole for tripod mounting. The SM-5 clamps on using the mic clamp. There is a metal (?) rod that has two diameters for different microphone clamps. If you remove the rod (same way as the SM-3), you have the same 3/8" boom pole thread and 1/4-20 tripod thread.

Guy Cochran · August 30th, 2007, 11:58 AM

The newer SM5's can now mount to a boom pole. The ones we have are threaded with 1/4" and 3/8"'s. Pretty cool.

Edward Carlson · August 30th, 2007, 12:37 PM

In that case, there seems no reason NOT to get the SM-5 if you have a mic clamp on your cam.

Stephen Sobel · August 30th, 2007, 03:57 PM

Does the Canon XH-A1 have a mic clamp? (I don't have the XH-A1 yet, stlll in the saving money and researching accessories stage).

Edward Carlson · August 30th, 2007, 04:12 PM

Yes. Do a Google image search and you can see it.

August 26th, 2007, 06:21 PM	#1
Stephen Sobel Major Player Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 408	Rode SM-3 vs SM-5 I'm considering the Rode NGT-1 or NGT-2 for the Canon XH-A1 camcorder. Which shockmount would work best, the Rode SM-3 or the Rode SM-5?

August 30th, 2007, 11:58 AM	#5
Guy Cochran DVCreators.Net Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 892	The newer SM5's can now mount to a boom pole. The ones we have are threaded with 1/4" and 3/8"'s. Pretty cool. Attached Thumbnails __________________ Guy Cochran DVinfo Sponsor, Cool Gear - DVeStore!

August 26th, 2007, 07:28 PM	#2
Edward Carlson Major Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: North Hollywood, CA, United States Posts: 807	I would go for the SM-3. The SM-5 can't mount to a boom pole, only to the clamp (without taking the thing apart). I actually fabricated a clamp adapter of my own out of a dowel rod. I later replaced my clamp altogether with a second shoe mount, one for the SM-3 and the other for my wireless receiver.

August 26th, 2007, 07:48 PM	#3
Stephen Sobel Major Player Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 408	Assuming I don't want to use a boom pole - how does the SM-5 attach to the clamp? How does the SM-3 attach to the camcorder?

August 26th, 2007, 08:33 PM	#4
Edward Carlson Major Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: North Hollywood, CA, United States Posts: 807	The SM-3 uses the shoe mount, or a boom pole mount. If remove the actual shock mount from the shoe mount by removing two screws, you also have a 1/4-20 hole for tripod mounting. The SM-5 clamps on using the mic clamp. There is a metal (?) rod that has two diameters for different microphone clamps. If you remove the rod (same way as the SM-3), you have the same 3/8" boom pole thread and 1/4-20 tripod thread.

August 30th, 2007, 12:37 PM	#6
Edward Carlson Major Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: North Hollywood, CA, United States Posts: 807	In that case, there seems no reason NOT to get the SM-5 if you have a mic clamp on your cam.

August 30th, 2007, 03:57 PM	#7
Stephen Sobel Major Player Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 408	Does the Canon XH-A1 have a mic clamp? (I don't have the XH-A1 yet, stlll in the saving money and researching accessories stage).

August 30th, 2007, 04:12 PM	#8
Edward Carlson Major Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: North Hollywood, CA, United States Posts: 807	Yes. Do a Google image search and you can see it.