|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 19th, 2007, 04:51 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV United States
Posts: 361
|
you have helped me narrow it down to a shotgun: Sanken CS-1 or mkh416?
Hi,
It's time to add a shotgun to my arsenal. I have a decent hypercardoid (akg ck93 - and will eventually look at the cmc641 when i can afford it), but am presently looking for that longer reach item - thus a shotgun. Probably will use it mostly outdoors and always on a boom (probably in a blimp) in a variety of conditions or at least when a hyper is not appropriate... and at the same $700-$800 that puts me at a Sanken CS-1 or a used Senny mkh416... what would you pros recommend? thanks, Lonnie
__________________
Lonnie Bell mamas boy productions Las Vegas, NV |
August 20th, 2007, 04:16 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 185
|
The CS-3e has a great reputation and would be my mic of choice if I were buying today. I'd have to do more research on the CS-1 (which I guess is what you're doing) but "blind" I'd go for a 416, and probably a second-hand one at that.
From Microphone Data: "The CS-1 is a short rifle microphone intended for film and TV but likely to find uses elsewhere too. The microphone is exceptionally short and light while retaining high directivity that is remarkably consistent - greater than 20dB front-to-back ratio across almost the entire frequency response. The CS-1 is small enough to fit onto ENG cameras but can also act as a high-quality boom microphone. The capsule is a Sanken original using a square diaphragm DC biased condenser design which can sustain SPLs as high as 137dB with only 1% distortion." |
August 20th, 2007, 04:11 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
cs-3e
Ty Ford |
August 20th, 2007, 11:32 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
I agree...
With Ty. Doing a huge mic article/review/test right now and the Sankens are emerging as an early front runner. Although those Schoeps are sweet but double your budget.
Dan |
August 21st, 2007, 04:37 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 383
|
Also look around at the used market. I was able to pick up a nice Neumann KMR-82i that was gently used (OK, not as gently used as I wanted, but it was from a rental house that was going out of business) in this price range, and shotgun mics do show up from time to time on the market.
Wayne |
August 22nd, 2007, 12:33 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV United States
Posts: 361
|
Alright guys...
If I extend my budget to the price of the CS-3e, that also puts us in the same price bracket as an MKH60. So which is it MKH60 or CS-3e for an all around exterior location mic with reach?
__________________
Lonnie Bell mamas boy productions Las Vegas, NV |
August 22nd, 2007, 01:41 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 185
|
CS-3e in my book
|
August 22nd, 2007, 11:57 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 204
|
I got a used, but pristine 416 for €400. If you buy from a soundguy who knows how to treat his/her equipment, you'll find them in pretty good state for that price.
Steven |
August 22nd, 2007, 01:05 PM | #9 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,015
|
Quote:
dan, when/where will you be posting your findings? |
|
August 28th, 2007, 04:58 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
I really really really dislike 416's. they are thin and cold sounding. the mkh60 was the replacement for the 416. I got to hear some side by side comparisons and the 416 was the worst sounding one of the bunch. sankens are nice, shoeps better.
|
August 28th, 2007, 07:16 PM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
With all due respect, if you think 416s are thin and cold, something is wrong with the particular 416s you have been exposed to .
The 416 has quite a bottom boost. I normally roll it off just to get it out of the way. The MKH 60 OTOH, to me and others, while obviously quieter, sounds very sterile. More reviews in the Article Archive on my website. Regards, Ty Ford |
August 28th, 2007, 07:58 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
I'd have to say about a dozen or more 416's. rentals, personal gear of audio guy, ect. A few months ago a side by side with several other shotguns. In that particular side by side, the 416 was the least pleasing and consistant with other times I've used them. 60 had more bottom in that one, and warmer sounding.
|
August 28th, 2007, 11:12 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 2,337
|
Um, rentals, that may answer the question. What mixer(s)?
It would be interesting to confer with the guys over on ramps about your reaction. Regards, Ty Ford |
August 29th, 2007, 01:32 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV United States
Posts: 361
|
ramps? what is ramps - another reference site?
googled "ramps" to no avail... what's ramps?
__________________
Lonnie Bell mamas boy productions Las Vegas, NV |
August 29th, 2007, 01:38 PM | #15 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
A lot of good info to be found in rec.audio.pro as well.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
| ||||||
|
|