|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 29th, 2007, 07:11 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 94
|
PP2.0 and Canon XH-A1. Not!
Many folks out there (found in dvinfo and Adobe forums) have run into two serious issues when trying to use the Canon XH-A1 with Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0.
1) You can't export more than about 6 minutes of 1080 60i footage back to the XH-A1. The symptom is that the A1 flashes an error about the DV connection and stops recording. 2) If you shoot and edit 1080 60i in PP2.0 and export to a SD widescreen DVD (pretty common workflow these days) the rendered result is terrible. Lots of jerky motion on zooms/pans and just general poor video. I have submitted defect reports to Adobe and Canon and seem to be getting nowhere (standard scripted generic answers and finger-pointing). In the meantime . . . I have invested $10K to get my company started in HD and these two issues are HUGE barriers to being able to really serve customers! If anyone out there has ways to get Canon's or Adobe's attention on this it would really be appreciated. This is our first Canon camera and, in hindsight, we should have stayed with Sony since it seems like they do not have these issues with PP2.0.
__________________
-- Larry Chapman |
April 29th, 2007, 07:28 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
This news is so shocking and has such far-reaching consequences and the fact that I've not heard mention of it untill this day suggests (hopefully) that there's something amiss with your preferences set-up Larry. But then if you've got so far as to start this thread, I'm guessing that you've spent many an hour struggling at the PC. I await others' input.
tom. |
April 29th, 2007, 10:48 AM | #3 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
The poor rendering from a PP2.0 1080 60i timeline to DVD is getting discussed to death in an Adobe forum with several folks seeing the issue and resorting to painfull workarounds. Look here: http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc39b52/68 If it's a "settings issue" then many of us are experiencing it and nobody has discovered the answer.
__________________
-- Larry Chapman |
|
April 29th, 2007, 11:15 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 47
|
Hi Larry,
I'm definatly no expert, as I'm new to HD myself, But I'm able to get awsome results from burning DVD from within Premiere 2. Here's my workflow..hopefully it helps a bit...Oh, I'm in PAL land. 1,Shoot footage HD 50i 2,Capture with premiere (using either Cineform or standard M2t) 3,Edit in HD 50i 1080 project. 4,Export final result as 50i 1080 avi or M2t (depends which I used) so I have one clip 5,Open new SD 720*576 widescreen project..import HD footage and resize (in my case to 54% to fit) create DVD menu/chapters etc..hit Burn and let prem encode and burn DVD, or create ISO image. I get an excelent result..But saying all this maybe I'm suppose to get better results..dont know, I'm definatly happy with the results.. The above workflow was one I learnt from the Total training video tutes. Ivan. |
April 30th, 2007, 06:12 AM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
Unfortunately there is no push-button good quality solution with Premiere, but the work-arounds are not all that bad.
One that works very well for me is editing in Adobe (either in the native format or in Cineform), resizing in VirtualDub and frameserving to any mpeg2 encoder; another one is even simpler and does not require a "real" intermediate step: frameserving from Premiere to Sorenson Squeeze. |
April 30th, 2007, 06:33 AM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
>> if that's the difference or not. >> >> I tried exporting to DV-AVI and the jittery zooms and pans >> were already there. Changing to LFF/UFF made no >> difference. >> >> Are you exporting a DV-AVI file or using other settings?
__________________
-- Larry Chapman |
|
April 30th, 2007, 06:35 AM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
__________________
-- Larry Chapman |
|
April 30th, 2007, 07:06 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
Oh well... we live in an imperfect world... As we all know, there is no perfect "all-in-one" editing suite, they all have their strenghts and weaknesses. I am totally with you on the "unacceptable" part, Adobe should have fixed this a long time ago! If you ask me, I would have spent the money they spent on acquiring DV Rack (that will be used by only a handful of buyers anyway) on something a lot more important, something we all need: a better mpeg2 encoder.
Still, computer-based digital video is a very young industry, and with a little patience we'll be doing much better in a few more years. Until then... we have the work-arounds... |
April 30th, 2007, 09:18 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 94
|
I tried the workflow outlined by Ivan and . . . it works!
So, it seems that the Premiere defect has, at least, these symptoms: Un-acceptable video quality when - 1) Burning a SD widescreen DVD direcly from a HD project. 2) Writing a DV-AVI file from a HD project. I'm not totally sure if the XH-A1 plays a role in this or not. I would like to hear from someone with a Sony camera completing #1 or #2 above with high quality results. Agreed?
__________________
-- Larry Chapman |
April 30th, 2007, 09:37 AM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Prague, MN
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
__________________
Kevin | www.kraentertainment.com A picture is worth 1,000 words | A 2 hour film at 24fps is worth 172,800,000 words |
|
April 30th, 2007, 12:26 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 94
|
Yes it is.
__________________
-- Larry Chapman |
April 30th, 2007, 01:34 PM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
We have to credit Steven Gotz with this method - he's been advocating for this a long time ago.
And yes, it is the same with Sony camcorders (Z1 in my case), it makes no difference. |
April 30th, 2007, 08:19 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 47
|
Hi All,
I'm glad its worked. With regards to step 3, I used the adobe 1080i 25 (50i) preset, If I was using 25f I would have used the canon preset, either way it works. You can see how it was done in "My Premiere Pro video tutes".. http://dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=92734 Ivan. |
May 1st, 2007, 07:42 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Prague, MN
Posts: 112
|
Thanks for clearing up my confusion!
__________________
Kevin | www.kraentertainment.com A picture is worth 1,000 words | A 2 hour film at 24fps is worth 172,800,000 words |
| ||||||
|
|