|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 2nd, 2006, 04:44 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 7
|
Ideal System for Premiere Pro 2.0
My question is this.
I've used Sony Vegas, Final Cut Pro, and am now trying my hand at Premiere Pro 2.0 from a friend's copy. While Vegas works fine, Premiere seems incredibly slow in accessing video from the timeline, playback, etc. I'm currently running on an Athlon 64 2800+ system, 1 meg of DDR400 memory, and a 6800 Nvidia Card. I do not have the system set up for RAID which is what some folks have suggested. Am I missing something? |
August 2nd, 2006, 05:37 PM | #2 |
Tourist
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brampton, ont Canada
Posts: 4
|
Try adding more RAM, Have a separte HD for your projects 7600 RPM or Faster, Stop all unneccasry services in control panel and then try.
I have no problems with pre pro 2.0 works very well for me. |
August 2nd, 2006, 09:09 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: US
Posts: 1,152
|
Kenneth's suggestions are good. While I have not dived into any big projects with Premiere Pro 2.0 yet, it has been very responsive so far on my system. I'm running a setup with a Pentium 4 3.0 GHz processor, 2 GB RAM, nVidia FX5700 graphics card, and dedicated 7200RPM hard drives for video projects (no RAID).
|
August 3rd, 2006, 06:53 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 335
|
I am running a P4 3.0 Dual Channel.
2GB Ram 36GB 10,000rpm 16MB buffer SATA II for the system drive 140GB SATA II 16mb 7200rpm RAID 0 for projects. 128MG ATI Graphics card It still bogs down sometimes |
August 3rd, 2006, 09:58 AM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
|
|
August 19th, 2006, 01:27 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Claremore Ok
Posts: 44
|
Nick,
Are you running 64bit Windows as well? |
August 20th, 2006, 07:59 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 34
|
I got a new system delivered just last week:
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.40GHz 1.0G Ram 640GB 7,200RPM RAID 0 GeForce 7600 GT 256M PP2 runs smooth and fast. In my experience, highest CPU speed is more important for this type of software than biggest memory.
__________________
Leo |
August 20th, 2006, 09:52 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 398
|
1GB of RAM??? You really need more than that. If not for PP over XP, for anything over Vista.
|
August 21st, 2006, 10:15 AM | #9 |
Sponsor: Electronic Mailbox
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 758
|
I agree. For video editing workstations we strongly recommend going with 2GB of RAM
Gary
__________________
Check out http://www.videoguys.com 800 323-2325 We are the video editing and live video production experts! DV InfoNet members save 5%! Use Coupon Code DVINFO5OFF |
August 21st, 2006, 10:47 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 37
|
The Theme: "2 + Quadro"
The theme is 2!
If you are CPU-bound, then moving to a dual-CPU motherboard certainly helps; PPro loves to SMP in a two-way environment. If you are memory-bound, then upgrading to 2 GB of RAM and striping two 10K disks together is critical. 2GB is always better than 1GB. 2 striped disks are always better than 1. 2 CPUs are definately better than 1 when editing with PPro. Hey, if you're not in Adobe Nirvana at this point, then stick a Quadro FX graphics accelerator in your PCI Express slot and PPro will offload work to it too! |
| ||||||
|
|