|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 3rd, 2006, 11:31 AM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 1,043
|
Need 16:9 mask for Premiere Pro 1.5
Has anyone made or is there available a 16:9 mask in PP1.5?
I am shooting 4:3 and making a 4:3 project, but would like to letterbox in post in case someone has a 16:9 display.
__________________
www.facebook.com/projectspecto |
May 3rd, 2006, 11:37 AM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hampshire, England
Posts: 1,545
|
Hi Marco,
try a search on this forum, its appeared a couple of times. Our very own Rob Lohman has some on his web site, but I can't remember the link. there is also a widescreen matte in title designer but i'm not too sure if its true 16x9. cheers,
__________________
Ed Smith Hampshire, UK Good things come to those who wait My Skiing web www.Frostytour.co.uk For quick answers Search dvinfo.net | The best in the business: dvinfo.net Sponsors |
May 3rd, 2006, 12:01 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 1,043
|
Thanks, I've search a couple times, but am probably not using the right key words, I keep getting discussions of 16:9 only, not many masks.
__________________
www.facebook.com/projectspecto |
May 3rd, 2006, 12:20 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
The titler has a template you can put on top.
|
May 3rd, 2006, 12:40 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 37
|
Here's a link to a ZIP file on my site that has several SD mattes in PSD format, including a 16x9:
http://www.chewbode.com/Portals/0/Pr..._Plates_SD.zip |
May 3rd, 2006, 01:56 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 493
|
Marco,
You don't necessarily need a matte. You can drop your sequence into a new sequence and put a "Crop" or "Clip" video effect on the whole sequence. I think you need to trim off about 60 pixels or about 12.5% off the top and bottom. I usually call the new sequence "Letterbox" and pop over to it occassionally to preview and ensure my clips are positioned correctly in the letterbox. Josh
__________________
Owner/Operator, 727 Records Co-Founder, Matter of Chance Productions Blogger, Try Avoidance |
May 3rd, 2006, 05:29 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 37
|
If you decide to crop or clip the video, these are the SD resolutions you could use, depending on the look you're going for:
720 x 480 = Standard Def (1.33:3) 720 x 350 = Academy Aperture (1.37:1) 720 x 270 = Widescreen TV 16 x 9 (1.78:1) 720 x 259 = Flat/Academy Aperture (1.85:1) 720 x 204 = Scope (2.35:1) |
May 3rd, 2006, 06:07 PM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 1,043
|
Thanks for the quick responses and solutions folks, much appreciated.
__________________
www.facebook.com/projectspecto |
May 3rd, 2006, 10:44 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 493
|
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Operator, 727 Records Co-Founder, Matter of Chance Productions Blogger, Try Avoidance |
|
May 10th, 2006, 10:46 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 1,043
|
Hey which of these is best to use. The Widescreen 1.78 mask or the Letterbox Academy 1.37? It seems like the academy 1.37 has much more viewable space, but will some be lost on a widescreen TV "zoom"?
__________________
www.facebook.com/projectspecto |
May 11th, 2006, 12:17 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 86
|
I found some of these replies using the key words "convert standard widescreen" in the search. I hope they help. :o)
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...ard+widescreen http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...ard+widescreen |
May 11th, 2006, 12:51 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 493
|
Marco,
For widescreen, you want 1.78, that is roughly the ratio of 16:9 HDTV. Academy 1.37 is almost the same as standard 4:3. Josh
__________________
Owner/Operator, 727 Records Co-Founder, Matter of Chance Productions Blogger, Try Avoidance |
May 11th, 2006, 01:41 PM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 1,043
|
Thank you. I am assuming then with the 1.78 a "widescreen zoom" will fill the whole screen, which is what I am looking for.
Thanks Tom, for the links.
__________________
www.facebook.com/projectspecto |
May 11th, 2006, 03:54 PM | #14 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Well, I think these are the accurate resolutions (I think the other calculations didn't take 0.9 pixels into consideration). Assuming 640 x 480 is your 0.9, NTSC resolution, your computer pixel aspect ratio (1.0) video would be: 720 x 480 = Standard Def (1.33:3) 720 x 467 = Academy Aperture (1.37:1) 720 x 360 = Widescreen TV 16 x 9 (1.78:1) 720 x 346 = Flat/Academy Aperture (1.85:1) 720 x 272 = Scope (2.35:1) If DV is 720 x 480, and you "convert" this to 0.9 broadcast aspect, you'd get 648 x 480, right? What's up with that 8-pixel horizontal resolution discrepancy? Anyway, I guess I'll need to go fix my letterbox mattes now. :( |
|
May 12th, 2006, 11:21 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 493
|
Matt,
Yep, now it looks right. Assuming 4:3 source, cropping down to the various ratios. Would be different for 16:9 source, of course, where you have some flexibility to stick with 720 wide, go to 864 wide, or do something else entirely. Josh
__________________
Owner/Operator, 727 Records Co-Founder, Matter of Chance Productions Blogger, Try Avoidance |
| ||||||
|
|