|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 12th, 2012, 04:09 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 293
|
quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
I just upgraded from a nvidia gts 240, stock card from a dell, to a Quadro 2000D, and when I do multicam its still choppy and looks bad.
I have a 3 disk raid 0, that is getting around 260mb read and write The 2000d is a certified CUDA card. I noticed there are a couple different drivers for the Quadro, what one would I want to use, or how should I configure it? there Driver choices are "ODE Graphics Driver" or "Performance Driver" or "Partner Certified Driver" and a couple more i had 4 streams of 1080p Cinform "High Quality" files system specs 18gig of ram, core i7 920 C-dirve for OS/programs 3 disk raid 0 |
April 12th, 2012, 07:10 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hamilton Ontario
Posts: 769
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
Just a quick test Dave...
Mute the audio on the far left of the track, and see if it's still choppy... There's been issues in the past with some users. It's an audio issue, and not video. Not sure what you mean about "looks bad"... |
April 12th, 2012, 08:42 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 293
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
that did nothing here is a screen shot, the right main video window looks like 8 bit Nintendo.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5271200/45.jpg |
April 12th, 2012, 08:44 PM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 293
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
Quote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5271200/45.jpg |
|
April 12th, 2012, 09:38 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hamilton Ontario
Posts: 769
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
Hey Dave....
Okay, firstly, I'll assume that you have the Mercury playback engine (hardware supported) option, and not software only selected. Secondly, what i see is the source, and not the preview monitor. I suppose keeping it pixelated allows for speedier playback. But let us know what the Program Monitor is showing, since the Program Monitor is an indicator of quality. |
April 12th, 2012, 11:09 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 293
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
Quote:
|
|
April 13th, 2012, 04:41 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
Dave,
This does not solve your problem, but you do realize that the Quadro 2000 is only a low entry level Quadro card at a high end price? It is around 4 times more expensive than the GT 240, but delivers only marginally better performance, and is way outclassed by a much more affordable GTX 570, that is around 0.6 times the price of the Quadro 2000 and the 570 performs at least 2 times better. Do you have the same results when you have both the source and program monitor set to 100%? |
April 13th, 2012, 11:56 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 293
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
maybe ill just return it then, I want one that is official for the adobe cuda, SO the 570 would be better?
GeForce GTX 285 GeForce GTX 470 GeForce GTX 570 GeForce GTX 580 Quadro CX Quadro FX 3700M Quadro FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800M Quadro FX 4800 Quadro FX 5800 Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000M Quadro 3000M Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000M Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000M Quadro 5010M Quadro 6000 |
April 15th, 2012, 04:44 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melrose Park, Illinois, USA
Posts: 936
|
Re: quadro 2000d, with multicam, choppy
Yes, David, the GTX 570 would be a significant improvement over either that Quadro 2000D or the GTS 240. You see, the GTS 240 is basically a 9800 GT with its 112 CUDA cores; however, most GTS 240s have only 512MB of VRAM which is not enough to even enable MPE GPU acceleration at all. The Quadro 2000D does have 192 CUDA cores but is held back by its 128-bit memory bus (although the RAM used in the Quadro 2000D is DDR5, like the GeForce GTS 450 that the Quadro 2000(D) is based on).
|
| ||||||
|
|