August 5th, 2010, 06:24 AM | #196 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melrose Park, Illinois, USA
Posts: 936
|
Maryus,
IIRC the FX 1800 has only 64 CUDA cores versus 96 on the 9600 GS. Thus, it is a combination of the lesser features of both the 9600 GS and the 9600 GT - a combination that's not found at all on any of the consumer 9600s. On the other hand, all of the FX 580s have only 512MB of RAM. As a result, it cannot use MPE's GPU acceleration at all due to an insufficient amount of graphics RAM. And the FX 580 is based on the 9500 GT. And the only reason why it outperformed the GTX 275 in 3D modeling programs is that the GTX 275's drivers are not optimized for 3D content creation work. As a result, the FX 580 might be faster than most of the consumer GeForce cards in MPE's software-only mode. |
August 5th, 2010, 01:20 PM | #197 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania\Busteni
Posts: 13
|
The ideea was to use GTX for premiere and FX for modeling. It doesn't matter :P I'll anounce if it works when I get the card :D.
Last edited by Maryus Ionel; August 5th, 2010 at 02:59 PM. |
August 5th, 2010, 09:38 PM | #198 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
I have read on the nVidia web site that they do not recommend mixing Quadro and non-Quadro cards in the same system for exactly that reason.
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
August 6th, 2010, 10:39 AM | #199 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Amman-Jordan
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
I seem to be misunderstood, i am not able to dare to buy the machine because it is expensive and that is gonna be a major loss if the PPE doesn't work on the GT 330M so this is why ám asking before i buy the machine ... But what ám getting from your answer is ( YES ) the hack works on the GT 330M windows laptops ! right .. Thanks again Amr Toukhy |
|
August 22nd, 2010, 08:37 PM | #200 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 137
|
Ive jst noticed there is a newer driver that came out last month.. 258.96
At the bottom is says "Supports the new GPU-accelerated features in Adobe CS5 ".... sOO its already been approved? Dont need to hack anymore? Im running on 275.21 any point going to 258.96?
__________________
www.ozan.ca |
August 22nd, 2010, 09:18 PM | #201 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 174
|
No Ozan you still need the hack - the hack is for the Adobe GPUsniffer which has nothing to do with Nvidia or its drivers. The only way we will get official support for more cards is if Adobe updates its software.
If you look you will see that the Nvidia drivers are 'one driver to rule them all' so the same driver that updates the 400 series also updates the 200 series. Thats why that line about CS5 is there - as it applies but only to the 285. |
September 3rd, 2010, 11:58 AM | #202 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
This has already been covered in the thread about the 5.0.2 update, but in case anyone missed it, you'll need to re-apply this hack after you update.
But you don't need to do any of the things that relate to "gpusniffer.exe"... just go to the cuda txt file and edit it to include your card. Simplest way, if for example you have a 480 but the file only specifies the 470 (which it will after the update), is to simply change the "7" in "470" to an "8" and be done with it. Less chance of errors or typos that way. Remember, the file doesn't need to list every card, only the one you have. If you do it this way you can safely ignore any of the instructions above that relate to the gpusniffer file. And after going through the process after the update, I think I can safely say that the steps involving the NVidia control panel are also completely unnecessary. I did not make any of the changes suggested above and GPU acceleration still works fine. Although I don't suppose it can hurt if you do so. It appears that all you really have to do is make sure your card in in the txt file.
__________________
"It can only be attributable to human error... This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error." Last edited by Adam Gold; September 3rd, 2010 at 02:02 PM. |
September 9th, 2010, 11:51 AM | #203 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania\Busteni
Posts: 13
|
Offtopic
It could be a little offtopic but Kronos 5 has arrived for AE CS5 and it enables some CUDA features for the retiming and it has the same compatibility list GeForce GTX285, Quadro FX 3800, CX, FX 4800 and FX 5800. I can't find no CUDA txt file to add some more cards :(.
http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/products/kronos/ |
September 9th, 2010, 12:02 PM | #204 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melrose Park, Illinois, USA
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
|
|
October 14th, 2010, 07:33 PM | #205 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melrose Park, Illinois, USA
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
Quote:
And since that list was posted, several new Fermi-derived GPUs have arrived. The GTX 465 is a "crippled" version of the GTX 470, with only 352 CUDA cores (versus 448 for the GTX 470) and a 256-bit GDDR5 memory bus (versus 320 bits with the 470). The more recent GTX 460 (336 CUDA cores) comes in two flavors: one with a 192-bit GDDR5 memory bus, the other with a 256-bit GDDR5 memory bus. The 256-bit version of the 460 is available with 1GB or 2GB of VRAM. And two cheaper Fermis, the GTS 450 and the GT 430, have 192 and 96 CUDA cores and 128-bit GDDR5 and 128-bit DDR3 memory, respectively. Thus, if someone chooses the GT 430, I would not recommend it unless that user is stuck with an older Intel CPU or an AMD CPU. That GPU would have performed roughly equal to that of the DDR3 version of the outgoing GT 240 - and slower than the GDDR5 version of the 240. |
||
October 19th, 2010, 05:05 PM | #206 |
Tourist
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pagadian City, Philippines
Posts: 4
|
about 2-3 months back, when the instructions came out on how to make the gtx480 work in premiere pro CS5 MPE, the nvidia control panel, program settings in manage 3D settings, recognized as premiere pro CS5 as adobe premiere pro CS5.
i had to reinstall CS5 just several hours ago, and now, program settings recognizes adobe premiere pro CS5 as adobe premiere pro CS4. nvidia drivers used: 260.89, for win7x64 checking on project settings of premiere pro cs5, render engine is MPE. question: what happened to the former and is there a difference to the latter? TIA |
October 20th, 2010, 03:12 PM | #207 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Orange, FL
Posts: 59
|
Don't worry about the NVidia driver saying CS4, it is reallying pointing to CS5.
|
November 13th, 2010, 04:04 PM | #208 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 6
|
trying to alter the notefile
hi guys,
obviously im doing something really silly............................... it says "access denied" when i try to save the altered file in notepad. any ideas? cheers, ronán |
November 13th, 2010, 04:13 PM | #209 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 6
|
sorry guys
found the answer deep in this thread,
thanks, ronan. moved the file to desktop to enable admin rights. |
November 16th, 2010, 01:36 AM | #210 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
I know people are going back and forth with this huge thread but I have a question. I am in the market for a new video card. I currently have a GT9800 I saw a GTS-450 fermi for like $120 if I hacked it would that give me good CUDA performance?
|
| ||||||
|
|