May 3rd, 2005, 02:59 PM | #196 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Saskatoon, Canada (was London, UK)
Posts: 138
|
The Z1 also lets you crop the edges for a 4:3 display, rather than letterbox.
|
May 3rd, 2005, 11:33 PM | #197 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: arlington, texas
Posts: 420
|
hey karl, i know this is a little off topic... but have ya'll added or can you add feature where you can capture the image flipped 180 for us homemade mini35 adapter users? or is it as easy as making a plugin for the program itself?
again, sorry for the off topic post. |
May 4th, 2005, 11:52 AM | #198 |
Serious Magic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 106
|
I'll check with the programming team, Cody. I don't have any information on this request right now.
__________________
Karl Soule' Product Marketing Manager, Serious Magic Professional Products Group. ksoule@seriousmagic.com |
May 9th, 2005, 02:51 AM | #199 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hythe, Kent, UK
Posts: 3
|
Excellent! Thanks for all your replies.
Andy |
May 17th, 2005, 09:13 PM | #200 |
Tourist
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort Collins Colorado
Posts: 3
|
Pat, you're right on with your assessment of the PCMCIA card being a separate resource. This would be similar to having two 1394-PCI cards in one's pc.
Besides the increased performance of your PC, there are several other factors which all contribute to the good experience you are having with your Lacie drive and X31: 1. The 320GB drive is 7200 rpm - much faster than the drive in your X31. 2. The Lacie probably has an 8MB buffer which will smooth any "moments" when the drive is busy seeking while video data is being captured. 3. Having a capture drive separate from your system (OS & app.) drive means one can better control how busy the drive is. I've recently seen "maximum data rates" on drives upwards of 70GB/sec. This far exceeds the data rate of 3.5MB/sec for video capture. The point being there's plenty of margin for "marketing fluff" and the reality that data rates across a drive are not constant. |
May 20th, 2005, 09:59 PM | #201 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NJ, US
Posts: 183
|
DV Rack trial and record issues
Hi,
I recently downloaded SM's DV Rack (the trial version) and whenever I attempt to record via the recorder, the image just freezes on the screen. Is there a fix to this particular issue or am I doing something wrong? My system specs are listed in my signature. DV Rack also records only for 5 seconds for some reason and after that it says 'Recording Stopped'
__________________
http://www.sareen.tv |
May 20th, 2005, 10:12 PM | #202 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NJ, US
Posts: 183
|
Looks like it was a corrupt install. I just reinstalled it and all is well :D
__________________
http://www.sareen.tv |
May 23rd, 2005, 08:24 AM | #203 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,065
|
Hey Pat
Where did you get that laptop from?
__________________
What happens if I push the 'Red' button? |
August 9th, 2005, 08:30 AM | #204 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 221
|
Enough Juice For DV Rack?
I have an older laptop that is in great shape all things considered, and I have wondered about running DV Rack on it. I was looking at the requirements on the Serious Magic web site, and I meet and exceed all except for processor speed. This thing has a PIII 796 MHz and I am thinking that this will be the end of my hopes. I really just want the ability to monitor video, and could care a little less about capturing strait to the HD.
Will this thing even run DV Rack? And if so, would I see video at the full frame rate? |
August 12th, 2005, 12:40 PM | #205 |
Serious Magic
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 68
|
You should get acceptable results for monitoring with that CPU. I'm pretty sure we tested with an 800 MHz processor back way back when and it ran okay for monitoring. Recording was another matter. I suggest that you download the free, full-function trial to see for yourself: http://www.seriousmagic.com/dvrackdemo.cfm. Monitor your CPU usage while running DV Rack--if it approaches 100%, then turn off some of the other components. The Waveform Monitor and Vectorscope will buy you the most headroom.
Incidentally, a new trial version should be available within the next week. It'll have HDV support and an option for showing both frames, which allows 1:1 pixel display in the Field Monitor. Your laptop will certainly not work with HDV, and it may choke on displaying both frames.
__________________
Mark Mapes OnLocation QA Manager, Adobe Systems |
August 22nd, 2005, 01:43 PM | #206 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
Posts: 22
|
Hi Rez Monitor in DV Rack
Does this mean hi-res monitor upgrade is close behing?
|
August 22nd, 2005, 02:47 PM | #207 |
Serious Magic
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 68
|
Yep. At least that's the plan. It took some pleading to get a DV Rack update wedged into our R&D schedule, and if I find any major new bugs then we will probably defer the update because the lead developer on DV Rack has higher priorities right now. So keep your fingers crossed and send some good vibes our way and we may have the update released in the next week or two.
__________________
Mark Mapes OnLocation QA Manager, Adobe Systems |
August 22nd, 2005, 10:37 PM | #208 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 221
|
Awsome, Thanks!
|
November 24th, 2005, 01:37 AM | #209 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
Getting camera TC onto HDVRack clips
Per the DV rack documentation, I should be able to get camera (Z1) TC onto the M2T that racks DVR records - but no dice. DVR seems to indicate shot duration only.
Pulling clips into Vegas and dropping timecode media fx on the clip also indicates that the clip starts at 0 tc instead of my camera preset TC that concurrently recorded tape shows... Can't think of what I'm missing - bug? Anyone gotten this to work? *********************** Edit: Working fine with DV, non-functional with HDV. Anyone got camera TC on their HDV recordings on DVRack? Last edited by Seth Bloombaum; November 25th, 2005 at 12:49 AM. |
November 24th, 2005, 01:39 PM | #210 |
Trustee
|
I've been wanting to do that for a while--and I know this isn't your direction--but this is what I did:
I own a GL2, so I set the camera to record the display overlap onto the actual tape. Then, instead of using native 16:9 recording mode, I used the title mix function to overlay the 16:9 bars--however, I shifted it downward so the two bars were together at the top. That way, the timecode, plus whatever information I desire (project title, scene title, all can be changed within Photoshop and reuploaded into the camera via laptop) can be put in the unused area. Then once I've finished editing, I simply export the film to avi, open a widescreen project, and scale it to fit the widescreen frame with the info bars cropped. Deelicious.
__________________
BenWinter.com |
| ||||||
|
|